On Saturday, 21 January 2023 at 23:07:45 UTC, jwatson-CO-edu
wrote:
I am trying to create a struct with a settable method that has
access to the struct scope.
Is this the only way?
Is there a way to give access without explicitly passing `this`?
Why not use the delegate? What exactly do you
So, which package do I use for TOML?
I find these three:
* toml-foolery (Andrej Petrović)
* toml-d, or toml.d (oglu on github) at ver 0.3.0
* toml, (dlang community on github) at ver 2.0.1
I'm guessing from version numbers that the third one, toml, is
officially good for real world use. But
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 at 23:19:35 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
That is, you can do OOP without classes
How so? Every OOP definition includes classes (encapsulation +
inheritance).
I hate a world with the classes. I can do almost anything I
want without the classes. The software world soared above C
without classes.
SDB@79
As I said in my email to you -- each to their own.
There's no point in arguing about whether OOP is the best method
of doing things or procedural
On 1/29/23 14:19, max haughton wrote:
> it is not trivial to find where the *end* of a
> function is
I suspected as much and did run ...
> objdump
... to fool myself into thinking that 0xc3 was . Well, arguments
e.g. pointer values can have 0xc3 bytes in them. So, yes, I am fooled! :)
Ali
On Sunday, 29 January 2023 at 21:45:11 UTC, Ruby the Roobster
wrote:
I'm trying to do something like
```d
void main()
{
auto d =
*d.writeln;
}
void c()
{
}
```
In an attempt to get the hexadecimal representation of the
machine code of a function. Of course, function pointers
On 1/29/23 13:45, Ruby the Roobster wrote:
> Of course, function pointers cannot be dereferenced.
Since you want to see the bytes, just cast it to ubyte*. The following
function dumps its own bytes:
import std;
void main() {
enum end = 0xc3;
for (auto p = cast(ubyte*)&_Dmain; true;
I'm trying to do something like
```d
void main()
{
auto d =
*d.writeln;
}
void c()
{
}
```
In an attempt to get the hexadecimal representation of the
machine code of a function. Of course, function pointers cannot
be dereferenced. What do?
Furthermore, I would like to be able to
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 at 23:19:35 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 January 2023 at 15:43:46 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
using static class and static function is not "OOP way" of
doing things, it's a hack to mimic procedural style because
Java doesn't have proper modules / scoping
