On Friday, 17 February 2017 at 23:24:57 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
Something like this would be a goods use for struct multiple
alias this, except that we haven't implemented that yet
unfortunately.
What's the deal with that? It seems someone made progress on this
issue 2 years ago and then
On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 17:24:40 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/13/2014 06:45 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Wrong. There are things which are simply bad ideas.
E.g. in this case, Egyptian-style braces definitely make
your code
more compact,
I.e. you see where
On Friday, 13 December 2013 at 05:55:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 06:42:26AM +0100, Brian Rogoff wrote:
I'm sympathetic to this POV, or something similar. For
example, a
multiyear plan to deprecate the 'is' syntax and replace it with
something better, in the current D. I'm
On Friday, 13 December 2013 at 05:22:26 UTC, Ross Hays wrote:
Yeah, is-expression syntax is one of the dark, ugly corners of
D that
unfortunately we're stuck with, because changing it now will
totally
break a LOT of code for merely cosmetic reasons. I honestly
wish that
one day this mess could
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 13:04:51 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Julia is a very new language, quite newer than D. I don't think
it's a good idea to recommend it for real work.
I don't think that the simple rule comparing age of the languages
in question for risk assessment is very useful. Given
On Wednesday, 28 August 2013 at 21:28:11 UTC, bioinfornatics
wrote:
Hi everyone,
yesterday i read an article into a french linux journal that in
some years garbage collector will disapear.
Why ? he explain in very very short as:
--
- Moore's law will be not anymore
On Saturday, 22 June 2013 at 21:27:01 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Ali Çehreli:
The code compiles under 32-bit (e.g. with the -m32 compiler
switch) where size_t is an alias of uint.
Thanks, Ali! I'm always compiling on 64 bit systems; I'll add the
32 bit switch to my diagnostic approach now.
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 11:30:00 UTC, Jos van Uden wrote:
On 16-2-2013 8:58, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 06:58:01 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 02:23:42 UTC, Jos van Uden
wrote:
On 5-2-2013 20:45, Jos van Uden wrote:
By the way, I think 'Qznc'
