On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 23:16:59 UTC, bertg wrote:
I am having trouble with a simple use of concurrency.
Running the following code I get 3 different tid's, multiple
"sock in" messages printed, but no receives. I am supposed to
get a "received!" for each "sock in", but I am getting
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 14:31:43 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 09:15:13 UTC, Dmitri wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 04:50:59 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 04:46:51 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 04:24:11 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 12:45:38 UTC, steven kladitis wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 12:18:36 UTC, Dmitri wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 11:44:21 UTC, steven kladitis
wrote:
C:\d\examples>pb2
=>main's first line
=>makeOmelet's first line
=>prepareAll's first line
I wondered if this is a current limitation of chunkBy
implementation:
// http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/52d6a0c5d0ab
void bar(int[] foo)
{
bool less(int a, int b) // contrived
{
return a < b;
};
foo.sort!less.groupBy;
}
resulting in:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 11:44:21 UTC, steven kladitis wrote:
C:\d\examples>pb2
=>main's first line
=>makeOmelet's first line
=>prepareAll's first line
=>prepareEggs's first line
object.Exception@pb2.d(64): Cannot take -8 eggs from the fridge
0x00402252
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 04:50:59 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 04:46:51 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 04:24:11 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 03:58:45 UTC, BBasile wrote:
none of the following GB commands work:
give
break
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 18:16:59 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/02/2015 02:21 AM, Dmitri wrote:
> [...]
implementation:
> [...]
Error:
> [...]
function
> [...]
less).SortedRange.groupBy!().groupBy
> [...]
the nested
> [...]
compilation error.
> [...]
Group should
> [...]
This is a known D
