On Saturday, February 9, 2019 2:19:27 PM MST Victor Porton via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> ISO C++ specifies that the C++ file must end with a newline.
>
> Should D file end with newline, too?
No, there is no need to end D files with a newline. I would guess that the
vast majority of D files
On Friday, February 8, 2019 4:27:44 AM MST Eduard Staniloiu via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, 8 February 2019 at 06:55:15 UTC, Jerry wrote:
> > On Friday, 8 February 2019 at 04:51:08 UTC, Sudhi wrote:
> >> On Friday, 8 February 2019 at 04:30:23 UTC, Arun
> >>
> >> Chandrasekaran wrote:
On Sunday, February 3, 2019 2:41:48 AM MST Ron Tarrant via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Saturday, 2 February 2019 at 19:40:25 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
> > https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Singleton#D
>
> Do you know if this is for a current version of D? The compiler
> is choking on the import
On Monday, January 28, 2019 10:41:55 PM MST Meta via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Monday, 28 January 2019 at 22:17:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
>
> wrote:
> > On 1/28/19 3:28 PM, Jonathan Levi wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 27 January 2019 at 09:31:46 UTC, bauss wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, 27 January 2019
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 8:19:06 AM MST Jacob Shtokolov via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to check whether it's possible to implement Python's
> SQLAlchemy-like query syntax in D, but I get stuck a bit.
>
> Here is a simple example of what I want to achieve:
>
> ```
> auto
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 5:42:55 AM MST FrankLike via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Wednesday, 23 January 2019 at 10:44:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 2:49:00 PM MST bauss via
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >
> > toUTFz is the generic solution.
On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 2:49:00 PM MST bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 22 January 2019 at 19:14:43 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 12:05:32 PM MST Stefan Koch via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 22 January 2019 at
On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 12:05:32 PM MST Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 22 January 2019 at 16:47:45 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 22 January 2019 at 16:18:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Use "mystring"w, notice the w after the closing quote.
> >
> >
On Monday, January 21, 2019 10:08:23 AM MST Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Saturday, 19 January 2019 at 17:45:41 UTC, Patrick Schluter
>
> wrote:
> > Afaict NULL pointer derefernecing must fault for D to be
> > "usable". At least all code is written with that assumption.
>
>
On Saturday, January 19, 2019 10:45:41 AM MST Patrick Schluter via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Saturday, 19 January 2019 at 12:54:28 UTC, rikki cattermole
>
> wrote:
> > On 20/01/2019 1:38 AM, Edgar Vivar wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have a project aiming to old 68K processor. While I don't
>
On Friday, January 18, 2019 8:34:22 AM MST Michael via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 13:29:29 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 12:27:17 UTC, Michael wrote:
> >> This, to be, looks like quite the explicit conversion, no?
> >
> > Yeah, I
On Friday, January 18, 2019 8:08:47 AM MST Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 00:08:00 UTC, 1001Days wrote:
> > It works, but I have two questions regarding its efficacy: is
> > it viable in the long run, and is it now possible to use
> > delegates without the
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 1:21:41 AM MST Dukc via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 January 2019 at 02:27:20 UTC, Neia Neutuladh
>
> wrote:
> > 1. Make a wrapper class. Now you can store Object[], or you can
> > make a
> > base class or base interface and use that.
> > 2. Use
On Friday, January 4, 2019 4:50:30 AM MST Jacob Shtokolov via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Friday, 4 January 2019 at 11:41:59 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
> > The thing is, compile-time tests like static if and static
> > assert can only test values that are known at compile-time, and
> > are for
On Thursday, January 3, 2019 3:28:35 AM MST Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> How does DIP 1000 treat the lifetime scoped class parameters and
> containers of classes?
scope isn't transitive, and putting an object inside a container would be
escaping it, which would violate scope. So, you
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 7:27:39 AM MST Per Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 December 2018 at 00:32:55 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> > No, because equality comparison between classes lowers to
> > `object.opEquals` [1], which takes both parameters as `Object`.
>
> This is
On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 1:19:42 AM MST rikki cattermole via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 19/12/2018 7:11 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Really? I would have thought that that would be a pretty obvious
> > optimization (especially if inlining is enabled).
>
> Assembly doesn't lie.
I'm
On Tuesday, December 18, 2018 9:20:11 AM MST berni via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 18 December 2018 at 14:32:29 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > CTFE is used if and only if it MUST be used by context. That's
> > a runtime function, so no ctfe.
> >
> > Do something like:
> >
> > int[4]
On Tuesday, December 18, 2018 5:42:12 AM MST rikki cattermole via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 19/12/2018 1:34 AM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 18 December 2018 at 10:42:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> Unfortunately, D does not currently have a way to do that. Only
> >> functions
On Tuesday, December 18, 2018 3:14:50 AM MST Per Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> What's the preferred way of creating a temporary @trusted scope
> without writing a separate function?
>
> Similar to Rust's
>
> unsafe { /* unsafe stuff here */ }
Unfortunately, D does not currently have
On Sunday, December 16, 2018 12:53:43 PM MST Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 12/15/18 5:14 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 15, 2018 10:27:36 AM MST Neia Neutuladh via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 17:19:05 +, Timoses
On Saturday, December 15, 2018 10:27:36 AM MST Neia Neutuladh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 17:19:05 +, Timoses wrote:
> > Running `dub test` will output:
> > Running ./unit-test-library writeln: unittest All unit tests have been
> > run successfully.
> >
> > Why is the
On Thursday, December 13, 2018 6:56:33 PM MST Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 12/13/18 7:16 PM, Michelle Long wrote:
> > I've noticed the compiler is not throwing up errors and warnings like it
> > used to:
> >
> > I thought D required breaks for cases? Seems it doesn't
On Tuesday, December 11, 2018 2:11:49 PM MST H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:02:41PM +, bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 11 December 2018 at 18:10:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > Autodecoding raises its ugly head again. :-/
On Friday, December 7, 2018 8:46:11 PM MST Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 December 2018 at 03:37:56 UTC, Murilo wrote:
> > Hi guys, I have created an array of strings with "string[12] ps
>
> string[12] isn't a range, but string[] is.
>
> Try passing `ps[]` to the
On Friday, December 7, 2018 2:42:33 PM MST Samir via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Ok. Upon further investigation, I think I see what is going on.
> Most of the repos I am skimming are for this year's Advent of
> Code. They structure their repo with an `app.d` file which does
> contain a `main`
On Friday, December 7, 2018 2:02:59 PM MST Samir via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Is it possible to write and execute a D program without a main
> function?
>
> Most of my programs will start with some `import` statements,
> followed by any functions and then ending with the `main`
> function
On Tuesday, December 4, 2018 3:17:04 PM MST jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I've noticed that I can use int like a constructor, as in:
> int x = int(1);
> but I can't do the same thing with slices
> int[] y = int[]([1, 2]);
>
> Is there something I'm missing here or is this a
On Monday, December 3, 2018 1:07:24 PM MST Goksan via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Are there any differences between these 2 methods of copying
> elements?
>
> double[] array = [ 1, 20, 2, 30, 7, 11 ];
>
> // Non dup
> double[6] bracket_syntax_dup = array;
> bracket_syntax_dup[] = array;
>
On Friday, November 30, 2018 2:43:41 AM MST welkam via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 04:47:26 UTC, Andrew Pennebaker
>
> wrote:
> > gcc is currently required for dmd on FreeBSD, as dmd links to
> > libstdc++.
>
> Parts of dmd are still written in C++ but most of it
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 10:41:56 PM MST H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 05:48:16PM +, Stanislav Blinov via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > On Saturday, 24 November 2018 at 17:43:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > > I'm still inclined to think though
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 9:28:47 AM MST Stanislav Blinov via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Saturday, 24 November 2018 at 07:00:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > [not legal]
> >
> > enum Foo
> > {
> >
> > a,
> > b,
> > version(linux) c = 42,
> > else version(Windows)
On Friday, November 23, 2018 11:22:24 PM MST Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 21:43:01 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > A solution like that might work reasonably well, but you still
> > have the problem of what to do when a symbol is documented in multiple
>
On Friday, November 23, 2018 11:13:24 AM MST H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> All in all, though, the fact that we're complaining about extra seconds
> in compilation times still does show just how fast D compilation can be.
> In the old days, compiling large C++ codebases usually
On Friday, November 23, 2018 7:55:04 PM MST H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> Adam does have a very good point about showing all alternatives to docs,
> though. Arguably, that's what ddoc *should* do. If the programmer
> wrote a ddoc comment in the code, it probably should be
On Friday, November 23, 2018 2:47:51 PM MST Tony via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> In std.compiler there is this code:
>
> /// Which vendor produced this compiler.
> version(StdDdoc) Vendor vendor;
> else version(DigitalMars) Vendor vendor = Vendor.digitalMars;
> else
On Wednesday, November 21, 2018 3:24:06 PM MST Johan Engelen via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 at 07:47:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > IMHO, requiring something in the spec like "it must segfault
> > when dereferencing null" as has been suggested before is
>
On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 11:04:08 AM MST Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 at 03:38:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > For @safe to function properly, dereferencing null _must_ be
> > guaranteed to be memory safe, and for dmd it is, since it
On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 8:38:40 AM MST Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Monday, 19 November 2018 at 21:23:31 UTC, Jordi Gutiérrez
>
> Hermoso wrote:
> > When I was first playing with D, I managed to create a segfault
> > by doing `SomeClass c;` and then trying do something with
On Monday, November 19, 2018 5:30:00 PM MST Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 11/19/18 7:21 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> > On Monday, 19 November 2018 at 21:52:47 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> >> A null pointer dereference is an immediate error, and it's also a
On Saturday, November 17, 2018 11:09:51 PM MST Carl Sturtivant via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 November 2018 at 19:01:45 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> > On 11/15/2018 09:14 AM, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
> > > opDispatch is special in that it allows for functions to be
> >
> > added to a
On Wednesday, November 14, 2018 2:54:27 AM MST realhet via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a little weird thing I noticed and don't know why it is:
>
> I have a FilePath struct and I wanted to make it work with the
> "~" operator and an additional string.
>
> So I've created a global
On Saturday, November 10, 2018 7:51:36 PM MST Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> On Saturday, 10 November 2018 at 23:29:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > The fact that they got added to ddoc just further degrades it
> > as a proper, macro-based markup language.
>
> The backticks
On Saturday, November 10, 2018 6:53:14 AM MST Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Friday, 9 November 2018 at 09:11:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > No, I didn't. I just used underscores, which has been used with
> > plain text for emphasis for decades. Supporting markdown, would
>
On Friday, November 9, 2018 5:22:27 AM MST Vinay Sajip via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Friday, 9 November 2018 at 11:24:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > decode and decodeFront are for converting a UTF code unit to a
> > Unicode code point. So, you're taking UTF-8 code unit (char),
> >
On Friday, November 9, 2018 3:45:49 AM MST Vinay Sajip via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Friday, 9 November 2018 at 10:26:46 UTC, Dennis wrote:
> > On Friday, 9 November 2018 at 09:47:32 UTC, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> >> std.utf.decodeFront(Flag useReplacementDchar =
> >> No.useReplacementDchar,
On Friday, November 9, 2018 1:27:44 AM MST Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 9 November 2018 at 06:42:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Honestly, having markdown in messages being typical would be
> > _really_ annoying for those of us not using the web interface,
> >
On Thursday, November 8, 2018 7:25:45 PM MST Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> It's not a forum. It's a newsgroup that happens to have a web interface.
> Newsgroups are text-only. So bbcode is out, html is out, but interpreting
> markdown might be reasonable. But nobody's done that
On Thursday, November 8, 2018 2:34:38 PM MST H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 01:28:47PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 8, 2018 10:55:45 AM MST Stanislav Blinov via
> >
> > Digi
On Thursday, November 8, 2018 10:55:45 AM MST Stanislav Blinov via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 16:13:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> > On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 15:50:38 UTC, helxi wrote:
> >> Although it's pretty frustrating, isn't it? Now not only I
> >> have
On Thursday, November 8, 2018 2:34:34 AM MST Michelle Long via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> Obviously, but that is not the case I mentioned. You can assume
> that I know how scopes work. No need to assume everyone that
> shows two cases that you have to bring up an unrelated case as a
> potential
On Thursday, November 8, 2018 2:15:43 AM MST Codifies via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 06:01:57 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 10:45:07 PM MST Jonathan M Davis
> >
> > via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
&
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 10:50:29 PM MST Michelle Long via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 02:22:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 1:03:47 PM MST Michelle Long via
> >
> > Digitalmars- d-learn wrote:
> >> Don't let their
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 10:45:07 PM MST Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 9:28:19 PM MST Codifies via Digitalmars-d-
>
> learn wrote:
> > I noticed that opOpAsign allows you to return a value...
> >
> > this means I
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 9:28:19 PM MST Codifies via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> I noticed that opOpAsign allows you to return a value...
>
> this means I can do this (return a node from my list class when
> adding a new node)
> ```
> anode = alist ~=
> ```
> to me this looks a little
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 1:03:47 PM MST Michelle Long via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> Don't let their psychobabble fool you. They are wrong and you
> were right from the start.
...
> Case A:
> {
> if (true) goto X;
> int x;
> }
> X:
>
>
> Case B:
> {
> if (true) goto X;
>
On Monday, November 5, 2018 7:55:46 PM MST MatheusBN via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 01:55:04 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> >> And I found a bit strange that in such code, since "x" is
> >> never used, why it isn't skipped.
> >
> > It's skipped right over. The
On Monday, November 5, 2018 5:33:56 PM MST MatheusBN via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 00:14:26 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Monday, November 5, 2018 4:54:59 PM MST MatheusBN via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I posted this in
On Monday, November 5, 2018 4:54:59 PM MST MatheusBN via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted this in another thread but without any response.
>
> This code:
>
> void main(){
> goto Q;
> int x;
> Q:
> writeln("a");
> }
>
> Gives me this error: "source_file.d(4):
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 3:03:16 PM MDT Venkat via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> while (1)
> {
> FLAGS f;
> switch (*p)
> {
> case 'U':
> case 'u':
> f = FLAGS.unsigned;
> goto
On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 2:18:15 AM MDT Laurent Tréguier via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Monday, 29 October 2018 at 21:50:32 UTC, aliak wrote:
> > Hi, so if you have this piece of code:
> >
> > struct C {
> >
> > void f() {
> >
> > string[] others;
> > const string[] restArgs;
>
On Sunday, October 28, 2018 12:56:10 PM MDT ikod via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Sunday, 28 October 2018 at 18:00:06 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
>
> wrote:
> > On Sunday, 28 October 2018 at 12:38:12 UTC, ikod wrote:
> >> and object.opEquals(a,b) do not inherits safety from class C
> >> properties,
On Sunday, October 28, 2018 6:38:12 AM MDT ikod via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Hello
>
> How to make this code to compile? My goal is safe(not @trusted)
> longFunction().
>
>
> ---
> class C
> {
> override bool opEquals(Object o) const @safe
> {
> return true;
> }
> }
>
On Sunday, October 28, 2018 12:17:41 PM MDT Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 18:00:06 +, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
> > On Sunday, 28 October 2018 at 12:38:12 UTC, ikod wrote:
> >> and object.opEquals(a,b) do not inherits safety from class C
> >> properties,
On Thursday, October 18, 2018 4:50:18 AM MDT Paolo Invernizzi via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> There's a rational behind the fact that there's not a 'shared'
> version of notify/wait method in Condition?
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo
The original author of the stuff in core.sync didn't want to update it
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 6:52:05 PM MDT Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> You can't quick-sort a list. You can merge sort it, and it's O(nlgn).
>
> I'll work on getting a sort routine into Phobos for it, but I don't know
> what the appropriate location for it is, as a
On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 4:26:40 PM MDT Chris Katko via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 October 2018 at 16:00:42 UTC, Steven
>
> Schveighoffer wrote:
> > On 10/10/18 9:22 AM, Chris Katko wrote:
> >> int[][] data =
> >>
> >> [
> >> [1, 0, 1, 0, 0],
> >>
On Thursday, October 4, 2018 5:44:55 AM MDT drug via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I was incorrect with description of the problem. The problem is that
> there is no simple way to distinct types and symbols if symbols are
> private. Because private symbol is not accessible you can not get any
>
On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 3:59:28 AM MDT bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 04:13:01 UTC, Joe wrote:
> > There appears to be a problem with the example at
> >
> > https://tour.dlang.org/tour/en/gems/unittesting
> >
> > If compiled with -unittest, the resulting
On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 6:09:53 AM MDT Vinod K Chandran via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 11:49:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Why do you have a function for that? All you need to do is use
> > the append operator. e.g.
> >
> > x ~= value;
> >
> > -
On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 5:40:18 AM MDT Vinod K Chandran via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a function and i want to convert this into a template so
> that i can use this function for more than one data type.
> This is my function.
> ```D
> void ArrayAdd( ref int[] x, int value)
On Thursday, September 27, 2018 6:16:13 AM MDT Atila Neves via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 at 14:13:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 at 12:05:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> >
> > wrote:
> >> If you use -betterC, then it's trivial,
On Thursday, September 27, 2018 2:44:25 AM MDT Chad Joan via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> The spec seems to have the homogeneous cases covered: classes
> with classes or structs with structs. What I'm more worried
> about is stuff like when you have a class compared to a struct or
> builtin
On Thursday, September 27, 2018 1:41:23 AM MDT Chad Joan via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 05:12:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> This is also reminding me of how it's always bugged me that there
> isn't a way to operator overload opEquals with a static method
> (or
On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 10:20:58 PM MDT Chad Joan via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 at 23:32:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 3:24:07 PM MDT Adam D. Ruppe
> >
> > via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> Object.factory
On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 3:24:07 PM MDT Adam D. Ruppe via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Object.factory kinda sux and I'd actually like to remove it
> (among other people). There's no plan to actually do that, but
> still, just on principle I want to turn people away.
While there may not
On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 5:03:11 AM MDT John Burton via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> I need to write a library to statically link into a c program.
> Can I write this library in D?
> Will I be able to use proper D abilities like gc? Obviously the
> public interface will need to be basic c
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 7:39:40 AM MDT Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Monday, 17 September 2018 at 19:13:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Monday, September 17, 2018 7:43:21 AM MDT Kagamin via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> try dpp
On Monday, September 17, 2018 7:43:21 AM MDT Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> try dpp https://github.com/atilaneves/dpp
Since according to Mike's post, it's C++ code, dpp wouldn't help, because it
currently only supports C and not C++.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Saturday, September 15, 2018 11:44:05 AM MDT Jan via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 September 2018 at 11:08:30 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Thanks for clarifying Jonathan :)
> But aren't the variables considered rvalues then?
No. variables are _always_ lvalues.
On Saturday, September 15, 2018 8:45:55 AM MDT Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 21:16:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Yeah, though if you write cross-platform applications or
> > libraries (and ideally, most applications and libraries
On Friday, September 14, 2018 11:39:48 PM MDT berni via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 03:25:38 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> > On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 20:43:45 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
> >> What you want is std.range.chunks
> >>
> >>
> >> auto a =
On Friday, September 14, 2018 2:52:42 PM MDT H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 07:05:35PM +, Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> > On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 17:59:38 UTC, Josphe Brigmo wrote:
> > > Seems to break dirEntries when trying to deal
On Thursday, September 13, 2018 4:04:58 AM MDT Jan via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Many thanks Adam and Steve! Works like a charm! :D
> I presumed classes are lvalues. I shouldn't make things more
> complicated than they are ;-)
Well, the variables _are_ lvalues. It's just that they're
On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 9:42:19 PM MDT James Blachly via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Neia is right that I tried to cast as in the second case ( but
> without UFCS -- reserve( cast(int[]), N); ). As an aside, what
> is going on behind the scenes with the compiler when casting away
> a
On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 5:41:16 PM MDT James Blachly via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> When I add the "shared" attribute to an array, I am no longer
> able to call reserve because the template won't instantiate:
>
> Error: template object.reserve cannot deduce function from
> argument
On Sunday, September 9, 2018 8:30:12 AM MDT Saurabh Das via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> Thank you for explaining all this.
>
> It is frustrating because the behaviour is very counterintuitive.
>
> I will use a workaround for now.
Ranges are fantastic, and the basic concept is solid, but a
On Sunday, September 9, 2018 2:49:56 AM MDT rikki cattermole via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 09/09/2018 8:41 PM, Christian Mayer wrote:
> > On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 08:14:41 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
> >> Are you aware that a string is just an alias of immutable(char)[]?
> >
> > Yes,
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 1:05:03 PM MDT Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 9/6/18 2:52 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 6, 2018 12:21:24 PM MDT Steven Schveighoffer via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> On 9/6/18 12:55 PM, Jonathan M Davis
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 12:21:24 PM MDT Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 9/6/18 12:55 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 6, 2018 2:40:08 AM MDT Saurabh Das via
> > Digitalmars-d->
> > learn wrote:
> >> Is this a bug with writeln?
> >>
> >> void
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 11:34:18 AM MDT Adam D. Ruppe via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 17:10:49 UTC, Oleksii wrote:
> > struct Slice(T) {
> >
> > size_t capacity;
> > size_t size;
> > T* memory;
> >
> > }
>
> There's no capacity in the slice, that
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 2:40:08 AM MDT Saurabh Das via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> Is this a bug with writeln?
>
> void main()
> {
> import std.stdio, std.range, std.algorithm;
>
> auto a1 = sort([1,3,5,4,2]);
> auto a2 = sort([9,8,9]);
> auto a3 = sort([5,4,5,4]);
>
>
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 8:33:47 PM MDT Nathan S. via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> The below writes "uint". Is this working as intended?
> https://run.dlang.io/is/Dx2e7f
>
> ---
> import std.stdio;
>
> auto foo(T = uint)(uint x)
> {
> return T.stringof;
> }
>
> auto foo(T = ulong)(ulong
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 9:22:26 AM MDT Timoses via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 14:26:44 UTC, Steven
>
> Schveighoffer wrote:
> > [...]
> > As general advice, I wouldn't expect const to work well with
> > Ranges anyway -- const ranges are useless (you can't
On Sunday, August 26, 2018 5:10:29 PM MDT Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Sunday, 26 August 2018 at 20:17:30 UTC, aliak wrote:
> > So if we had this:
> >
> > struct A(T) {
> >
> > auto proxy() @trusted {
> >
> > return B!T();
> >
> > }
> >
> > }
> >
> > struct B(T) {
>
On Saturday, August 25, 2018 6:53:24 AM MDT Ivo via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I am using Clock.currTime.stdTime to get a unique timestamp in my
> program.
> Now I need to produce something similar in a different
> programming language; so I'm trying to understand how
> Clock.currTime works.
>
On Friday, August 24, 2018 11:36:25 AM MDT Matthew OConnor via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> I'd like to run a sequence of executables with something like
> std.process.execute, but I would like the sequence to error out
> if one of the executables returns a non-zero return code. What is
> the
On Friday, August 24, 2018 3:28:37 PM MDT Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 08/24/2018 12:30 PM, John Burton wrote:
> > On Friday, 24 August 2018 at 15:26:30 UTC, kinke wrote:
> >> On Friday, 24 August 2018 at 13:10:40 UTC, John Burton wrote:
> >>> Is in the subject.
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:56:06 PM MDT Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 14:56:21 UTC, Seb wrote:
> > I'm aware, but we don't have any other process for people to
> > show their support for a DIP, do we?
> >
> >
> > And for DMD/Druntime/Phobos etc.
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 1:46:31 PM MDT Jim Balter via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> That's a lot of detail. The bottom line is that the warning in
> the spec is completely wrong and should be removed -- using
> property functions is not discouraged, nor is @property.
> @property should be
301 - 400 of 1821 matches
Mail list logo
