so my question why am i'm getting this error and how do i fix
this?
I just added
dub add inochi-creator
then
dub run
but got the error:
```
Unresolvable dependencies to package bindbc-sdl:
bindbc-imgui 0.7.0 depends on bindbc-sdl ~>0.21.4
inochi-creator 0.7.4 depends on bindbc-sdl ~>1.1.2
```
the dub.json looks like this:
```
{
"authors": [
On Tuesday, 4 January 2022 at 19:06:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 1/4/22 10:53 AM, Dr Machine Code wrote:
what made that change, assuming it worked at time. Library?
compile changes?
Here is the changelog item:
https://dlang.org/changelog/2.088.0.html#remove-nullable-alias-get-this
A
On Tuesday, 4 January 2022 at 17:58:05 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 January 2022 at 17:23:11 UTC, Dr Machine Code
wrote:
I could fix just with
```d
data.entries ~= entry.get;
```
This is what the original code was doing - it used to
implicitly do this.
So while this
I've tried to build 2 years old D project and I was getting the
error:
> Error: cannot append type `Nullable!(SelectorEntry)` to type
`SelectorEntry[]`
I went to use Nullable, 'cause I've never used it before. Boiling
down the error was something like (minimal code reproduction):
```d
it differ from assert because it contains the expression, file
and line information. See this
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14420857/check-expect-example-in-racket
what's the closest thing we have in D? can we make it without
compiler builtin?
On Wednesday, 17 November 2021 at 03:21:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 11/16/21 6:10 PM, pascal111 wrote:
Is there a so simple text editor written in D as an example
for learners. I hope the editor whose code is written in D is
available with someone.
I am not familiar with any of them but
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 23:51:42 UTC, foxit wrote:
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 22:35:21 UTC, forkit wrote:
[...]
Actually, the reason I got soo confused is clear to me now.
I have my own GUI IDE, which I wrote myself (winforms/C#) cause
I got so fed up with creating/saving
On Friday, 29 October 2021 at 17:29:57 UTC, harakim wrote:
On Sunday, 24 October 2021 at 05:46:48 UTC, Dr Machine Code
wrote:
I'd like that to some friends getting start with programming.
Sadly that platform doesn't support D.
I wouldn't mind helping out by reviewing code or answering
On Thursday, 28 October 2021 at 01:29:41 UTC, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
On Sunday, 24 October 2021 at 05:46:48 UTC, Dr Machine Code
wrote:
I'd like that to some friends getting start with programming.
There are also websites, which host programming competitions.
Beginners friendly:
*
On Monday, 25 October 2021 at 15:43:06 UTC, Willem wrote:
I was able to resolve above issues by following the install
guide by DrIggy @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuJBj_tgsR8
Thanks for posting it.
Willem
A friend of mine was with this issue. We just end up using ldc2
but would be
On Sunday, 24 October 2021 at 19:14:59 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Sunday, 24 October 2021 at 05:46:48 UTC, Dr Machine Code
wrote:
I'd like that to some friends getting start with programming.
Sadly that platform doesn't support D.
https://exercism.org/tracks/d
also good one, thanks
On Sunday, 24 October 2021 at 12:49:03 UTC, jfondren wrote:
On Sunday, 24 October 2021 at 05:46:48 UTC, Dr Machine Code
wrote:
I'd like that to some friends getting start with programming.
Sadly that platform doesn't support D.
Here are a few:
https://www.codingame.com/
https://www.spoj.com/
I'd like that to some friends getting start with programming.
Sadly that platform doesn't support D.
That's right, thank you all guys. Found my mistake; should be:
serialize!(typeof(field))(__traits(getMember, output,
fieldName));
I was writing a recursive function that uses template, I thought
it would generate the proper template function on the fly to
match the type in the parameter but it seems to not so so and try
to use the called function, resulting in the error:
Error: function foo.serialize!(B).serialize(ref B
On Tuesday, 27 August 2019 at 16:25:00 UTC, Samir wrote:
On Sunday, 25 August 2019 at 17:01:23 UTC, a11e99z wrote:
auto foo = ["VXE":8, "BZP":5, "JLC":2];
foo.byPair.array.sort!"a[0]
On Sunday, 25 August 2019 at 19:03:10 UTC, JN wrote:
I think normal lambdas are better than these string ones:
On Wednesday, 12 June 2019 at 14:09:08 UTC, Newbie2019 wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 June 2019 at 13:53:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:12:58PM +, Newbie2019 via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Read:
https://wiki.dlang.org/User:Quickfur/Compile-time_vs._compile-time
T
On Tuesday, 11 June 2019 at 02:24:49 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2019 at 02:04:13 UTC, Machine Code wrote:
I also, quite disappointed how UDAs doesn't work with enums. I
end up using struct + enum to simulate that, sometimes it's
quite a work.
They do now...
struct foo {}
On Wednesday, 14 November 2018 at 16:28:19 UTC, Radu wrote:
Looks like that there is no easy way to extract a function
parameters UDA list.
The following:
```
import std.traits;
struct s { string foo; }
void foo(@s("aaa") int a, bool x);
void main()
{
alias P = Parameters!foo;
enum
On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 16:41:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 16:33:13 UTC, Machine Code wrote:
All this effort is because I do not want unittest code in a
release or even debug.
Well, that part is easy:
version(unittest)
struct Foo {}
at any scope is only build
On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 16:30:34 UTC, Machine Code wrote:
On Thursday, 6 June 2019 at 21:02:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
[...]
Intesting, I also tried to declare it inside a function, that
did not work either. Is this hidden context pointer a current
limitation in CTFE? I've tried
On Thursday, 6 June 2019 at 21:02:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/6/19 1:49 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 6 June 2019 at 17:40:17 UTC, Machine Code wrote:
outside an unittest, this compiles fine:
struct A
try making it `static struct` instead
cannot implicitly convert
On Thursday, 6 June 2019 at 17:49:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 6 June 2019 at 17:40:17 UTC, Machine Code wrote:
outside an unittest, this compiles fine:
struct A
try making it `static struct` instead
didn't work either
cannot implicitly convert expression "hehe" of
On Thursday, 6 June 2019 at 17:40:17 UTC, Machine Code wrote:
outside an unittest, this compiles fine:
struct A
{
enum A foo = "hehe";
this(string a) { m_a = a; }
alias m_a this;
string m_a;
}
but if you
outside an unittest, this compiles fine:
struct A
{
enum A foo = "hehe";
this(string a) { m_a = a; }
alias m_a this;
string m_a;
}
but if you wrap this a unittest {} and compile with
dmd -unittest -run
On Friday, 31 May 2019 at 19:22:03 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 01/06/2019 7:07 AM, Machine Code wrote:
is there something on std library or package on dub to get a
executable version on windows? just in case I don't need to
dig into winapi.
Like C#'s:
is there something on std library or package on dub to get a
executable version on windows? just in case I don't need to dig
into winapi.
Like C#'s:
FileVersionInfo.GetVersionInfo(path).FileVersion
On Thursday, 9 May 2019 at 10:09:23 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
Hi,
this is likely not related to D itself but hopefully someone
can help me with this since I'm rather new to windows
programming, I mainly work on linux. I'm trying to bundle a DLL
in a binary, write it in a temp folder, use it and
On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 at 21:24:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 at 21:07:51 UTC, Machine Code wrote:
void f(appender!string buffer) { }
appender isn't a type, it is a helper function that returns a
type called Appender:
I've tried those syntaxes:
void f(appender!string buffer) { }
void f(A = appender)(A!string buffer) { }
but no luck... how do I do that?
So I find out the issue: it was due a struct member of the class
having @disable this();
public this() { }
Doesn't change anything...
What's that error? below code used to work fine, now it gives
this compiler error.
class Keyword
{
this(string value, Token type)
{
this.value = value;
this.type = type;
}
string value;
Token type;
Keyword next;
}
On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 at 17:56:10 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 at 17:52:35 UTC, Machine Code wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/master/src/dmd/compiler.d#L75
https://dlang.org/spec/lex.html#token_strings
:)
I had just infered from the commend in the code
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/master/src/dmd/compiler.d#L75
I'm using enum to compute the value at runtime like this:
struct A
{
enum foo = A("foo", 10);
enum baa = A("baa", 20);
string name;
int value;
alias value this;
}
In order to avoid foo having its value (even if literal) copied
every time A instancied
On Thursday, 3 January 2019 at 21:41:44 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 20:34:17 +, Machine Code wrote:
Thank you very much, Ali. So the issue was basically I can't
return from a static foreach() loop right?
The static foreach is done at compile time and the return is
done
On Thursday, 3 January 2019 at 19:38:39 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 01/03/2019 10:49 AM, Machine Code wrote:
> I wrote a small routine to return the first member
I see that that's possible because the values of such members
are known at compile time in your case. Otherwise, you would
need a
I wrote a small routine to return the first member of type T of a
same type, like struct below, but the assert is reached albeit
the "yes" message is printed. What am I missing? should I use
something else than return keyword to return from a template
function or what?
struct Color
{
On Wednesday, 26 December 2018 at 18:03:44 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 December 2018 at 17:33:13 UTC, Machine Code
wrote:
Are the below statements equivalent?
Yes, it is defined here:
https://dlang.org/spec/statement.html#switch-statement
(#2 in the list)
Thanks!
Give:
enum Foo { a, b, c, d, e }
Foo f = Foo.c;
Are the below statements equivalent?
switch(f) {
case Foo.a:
case Foo.b:
doSomething();
break;
// ...
}
and:
(note the comma in the case)
switch(f) {
case Foo.a, Foo.b: doSomething(); break;
// ...
}
I found it
42 matches
Mail list logo
