On Monday, 15 February 2016 at 15:17:01 UTC, tcak wrote:
[...]
BUT (This is a big but with single t), in multithreaded
process, throwing Error in a thread that is not the main thread
won't stop your process still and you are still left with
"exit" function.
Mind, if you're doing the normal
On Friday, 12 February 2016 at 20:43:24 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
So I have this code and I have to add the element
.each!(a => a.each!("a"));
to the end in order for it to evaluate the range completely and
act like I expect it too. Is there a better thing to put in
the place of
.each!(a
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 15:59:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
You never asked for CTFE.
CTFE only happens when it *has* to - when you write code that
specifically asks for or requires it.
What is a good way to try to force it? Using enum? Then
optionally copying the value once to
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 17:16:30 UTC, Andrea Fontana
wrote:
But if I want a normal var, not static or enum?
There's no way to force it?
Just make a mutable copy of it, I think.
On Saturday, 28 March 2015 at 01:09:44 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 11:33:39 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Hmm... science exists only as long as we don't understand
something, then it disappears and only knowledge remains.
Looks like he talks about engineering, but calls it
On Thursday, 5 March 2015 at 07:38:35 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 06:05:55 +, zhmt wrote:
But I am not familiar with dlang
this is the root of the problem. please, make yourself familiar
before
starting to wrap boost crap.
Unwarranted tone imo. Let's play nice.
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 23:36:44 UTC, Israel wrote:
I wasnt paying any attention to the file size of my binaries
when
i started using D.
My first program is simple and compiles at 486kb, which
honestly,
is kind of absurd but anyways, after i start adding other
imports
it ran all the
On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 10:31:59 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 08:35:41 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I wonder if using plain `Array` instead may be result in
better performance
where immutability is not needed.
Hmm, no:
...
It is very
On Saturday, 9 August 2014 at 09:11:53 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Saturday, 9 August 2014 at 03:46:05 UTC, timotheecour wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 August 2014 at 17:03:23 UTC, Timothee Cour via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Is there a reason why 'with(Foo):' is not allowed, and we
have to
use
