On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 06:46:03 UTC, bearophile wrote:
ketmar:
other function declarations (methods, nested functions) accepts
'static', so why free functions shouldn't?
For various reasons, one of them is that accepting useless code
confuses newbies and doesn't allow them to build a
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 05:29:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 01:32:40 +
Phil Lavoie via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com
wrote:
Ok, so after years of D usage I just noticed that this is
valid D
(compiles anyways
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 14:23:47 UTC, bearophile wrote:
H. S. Teoh:
Is there a bug filed for this?
Probably there is. But I stopped filing similar bugs because
they seem to have a very low priority.
Bye,
bearophile
I looked around for it but didn't find it. I filed this one:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 17:42:37 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 06:46:02 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com
wrote:
accepting useless code confuses newbies
i think that i'm not really a newbie now ;-), but i'm still
All you said makes sense. If there is a direct connection between
getter, setter and member than yes, returning it by reference is
usually more convenient:
private T _member;
@property ref inout(T) member() inout {return _member;}
However, sometimes, there is no direct connection between
On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 19:05:11 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 18:51:38 UTC, bearophile wrote:
It could be sufficient, but note that in Phobos there are two
different versions of Nullable, one of them doesn't require
extra memory, it uses one value as the null value.
Ok, so after years of D usage I just noticed that this is valid D
(compiles anyways):
static void myFunc() {}
What is a static function at module level exactly? In C, that
means private, in D, that means ___?
Thanks,
Phil
I'm trying to build dmd from source but make can't open the
makefile.
I checked out the source and everything and the make version I
use is the one that comes with the distribution:
Digital Mars Make Version 5.06
So I'm in the source folder (...\dmd2\src\dmd\src), I can clearly
see that
On Thursday, 7 August 2014 at 01:18:52 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Thursday, 7 August 2014 at 01:15:36 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
[...]
make release -fwin32
Here is the output:
Error: can't read makefile 'win32'
I'm building on Windows btw.
Thanks,
Phil
Close. You need the extension, I
On Thursday, 7 August 2014 at 01:37:46 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Thursday, 7 August 2014 at 01:27:55 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
Nope, still not working, but thx.
Hmm, are you in the src directory?
Yes and ls *.mak shows three makefiles:
osmodel.mak
posix.mak
win32.mak
On Thursday, 7 August 2014 at 02:13:38 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Thursday, 7 August 2014 at 01:50:50 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
On Thursday, 7 August 2014 at 01:37:46 UTC, Brad Anderson
wrote:
On Thursday, 7 August 2014 at 01:27:55 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
Nope, still not working, but thx.
11 matches
Mail list logo
