Tom S wrote:
2) Perhaps a custom-fit Delorian will do.
DeLorean, even.
Max Samukha wrote:
Tom S wrote:
And/or compile some modules without -g. Maybe you don't need debug
symbols everywhere.
And please vote for
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/votes.cgi?action=show_bugbug_id=424.
Something makes Walter think this bug is not critical.
I think he knows
Denis Koroskin wrote:
I was refactoring the following line of code:
foo(rand() % 256); - foo(0);
and that causes Optlink to crash now. Any reason why it does so?
That particular file is just 157 lines long, but the whole project is quite
big, although there are no large files. The biggest
bearophile wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad:
I think the compiler should be smart enough to figure this out for
itself, but until that happens you can work around it by suffixing at
least one of the integer literals with LU, so the compiler interprets
the entire expression as an ulong:
To make
