On Wednesday, 13 July 2016 at 14:01:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Yes, your code is legal.
What isn't legal is using some type that isn't there at
runtime, like
union A {
int[] a;
char[] b;
}
A u;
u.a = [1,2];
u.b.length
The compiler will let you do it, but being a union, it will
Can I place a dynamic array, an associative array and a string to
a union and work with all elements? They are built-in types, but
actually not primitive ones (this is not allowed in C++ for
example). That's why I'm in doubt. I'm trying to implement
something close to variant type (with a few
On Monday, 11 July 2016 at 12:42:57 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 07/11/2016 02:28 PM, zodd wrote:
Suppose I have a class with a few protected functions. I want
to let
another class from the same package call these functions. Thus
I've
added a "package" attribute and got the following:
Error:
Suppose I have a class with a few protected functions. I want to
let another class from the same package call these functions.
Thus I've added a "package" attribute and got the following:
Error: conflicting protection attribute 'package' and 'protected'
How can I achieve what I want? These
On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 at 09:48:59 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
Nice work.
Personally, I'd do it this way: http://pastebin.com/38n0fEtF
This way:
- instead of 4 pointers (2 per delegate), the wrapper only
contains 1 pointer;
- once written, it only requires one line per property to be
So, I've created a simple wrapper template to achieve what I
want. It reminds me of the C++ - a bunch of additional code to
solve a simple problem (which shouldn't be an issue at all). I'm
a newbie in D thus I could do something wrong or nonoptimal.
Please, criticize my code:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2016 at 13:37:50 UTC, ketmar wrote:
you *can* workaround this limitation for now. it won't be the
cleanest code in the world, but you can do it. hint: alias this
+ returning temporary struct with pointer.
Of course, I can. I have been creating a lot of such workarounds
On Tuesday, 5 July 2016 at 13:37:50 UTC, ketmar wrote:
if this minor thing blocks you from using D... alas. otherwise,
just make a workaroung and keep going. *eventually* this will
be fixed, but you'd better don't wait for it.
No, this issue doesn't block me from using D. I'm asking because
On Tuesday, 5 July 2016 at 12:45:33 UTC, ketmar wrote:
Is there a chance, that this weird behavior will be fixed in
the near future? What can I do to help fix it?
almost as much as you can expect snowfall in hell.
Why do you have so pessimistic opinion? Is D a perspective
language to learn
On Tuesday, 5 July 2016 at 11:02:11 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2016 at 10:52:10 UTC, zodd wrote:
Property functions are used wrong by a compiler when it needs
to get and set a value at the same time:
[...]
Try
@property ref int value() {
return value_;
}
10 matches
Mail list logo
