Re: [OT] What is more readable?

2010-08-10 Thread bearophile
simendsjo: And on the other hand; I doubt anything of what I write will ever get into phobos! If you exercise writing D code for few months you will be able contribute to Phobos2. Bye, bearophile

[OT] What is more readable?

2010-08-09 Thread simendsjo
Continuing my what is more readable thread (just shut me up, but I don't always agree with i, j, k etc...): std.string.count: size_t count(string s, string sub) { size_t i; int j; int count = 0; for (i = 0; i s.length; i += j + sub.length) { j = indexOf(s[i ..

Re: [OT] What is more readable?

2010-08-09 Thread Jonathan M Davis
On Monday, August 09, 2010 17:20:07 simendsjo wrote: Continuing my what is more readable thread (just shut me up, but I don't always agree with i, j, k etc...): Personally, I think that i is just fine in many cases where it's quite clear what you're doing. e.g. the standard for loop:

Re: [OT] What is more readable?

2010-08-09 Thread simendsjo
On 10.08.2010 02:40, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Monday, August 09, 2010 17:20:07 simendsjo wrote: Continuing my what is more readable thread (just shut me up, but I don't always agree with i, j, k etc...): Personally, I think that i is just fine in many cases where it's quite clear what