Rather than change it to int/ulong, just change it to 'size_t
len = parent.children.length+1' (or auto instead of size_t).
This way it's proper for both 32-bit and 64-bit and you don't
need to worry about architecture. If you do need a signed
version, you can use ptrdiff_t.
Yup, that's what
On Monday, 17 February 2014 at 07:46:02 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
On Monday, 17 February 2014 at 07:17:06 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
What is size_t for 64 bit?
Steve
Sorry parent.children is just a straightforward array
Sorry again - forget about it. I'd forgotten that D actually
says int is
Why is it that with 32 bit compilation, int is 32 bits, but
apparently this convention is not followed in 64 bit compilation.
I have not installed the 64 bit compiler yet, but apparently
int len = parent.children.length+1;
provokes the following error
acomp.d(782): Error: cannot implicitly
On Monday, 17 February 2014 at 07:15:20 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
Why is it that with 32 bit compilation, int is 32 bits, but
apparently this convention is not followed in 64 bit
compilation.
I have not installed the 64 bit compiler yet, but apparently
int len = parent.children.length+1;
On Monday, 17 February 2014 at 07:15:20 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
Why is it that with 32 bit compilation, int is 32 bits, but
apparently this convention is not followed in 64 bit
compilation.
I have not installed the 64 bit compiler yet, but apparently
int len = parent.children.length+1;
On 2/17/2014 4:23 PM, evilrat wrote:
but it looks like length is not size_t but ulong in which case you need
explicit cast from larget to smaller type. check lenght signature
size_t is an alias to ulong on 64-bit. Aliases tend to show up in error
messages as the underlying type.
On 2/17/2014 4:15 PM, Steve Teale wrote:
parent is just a straightforward array
What is size_t for 64 bit?
It's ulong on 64-bit and uint on 32. size_t and ptrdiff_t are defined as
aliases in object.d.
On Monday, 17 February 2014 at 07:46:02 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
On Monday, 17 February 2014 at 07:17:06 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
What is size_t for 64 bit?
Steve
Sorry parent.children is just a straightforward array
Sorry again - forget about it. I'd forgotten that D actually
says int is
On Monday, 17 February 2014 at 07:17:06 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
What is size_t for 64 bit?
Steve
Sorry parent.children is just a straightforward array
Sorry again - forget about it. I'd forgotten that D actually says
int is 32 bits, and ulong is 64, and size_t for a 64 bit machine
is
