On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:24:03PM +1300, James Miller wrote:
On 24 February 2012 12:06, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:06:52AM +1300, James Miller wrote:
On 23 February 2012 13:15, BLM blm...@gmail.com wrote:
After messing around for a while, I figured
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:06:52AM +1300, James Miller wrote:
On 23 February 2012 13:15, BLM blm...@gmail.com wrote:
After messing around for a while, I figured out what is making DMD choke on
my
file. The methods were defined in the base class using template mixins, and
apparently DMD
On 24 February 2012 12:06, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:06:52AM +1300, James Miller wrote:
On 23 February 2012 13:15, BLM blm...@gmail.com wrote:
After messing around for a while, I figured out what is making DMD choke
on my
file. The methods were
After messing around for a while, I figured out what is making DMD choke on my
file. The methods were defined in the base class using template mixins, and
apparently DMD doesn't like it when mixins, inheritance, overloading, and
aliases
are all in the same piece of code :)
I'm working on a project where I'm using overloaded virtual methods, and I've
run into a challenge with overload sets.
My code looks something like this:
class Base {
void get(ubyte b) {};
}
class Derived: Base {
//alias Base.get get;
void get(string s) {};
}
I've tried using an alias
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 02:21:43 BLM wrote:
I'm working on a project where I'm using overloaded virtual methods, and
I've run into a challenge with overload sets.
My code looks something like this:
class Base {
void get(ubyte b) {};
}
class Derived: Base {
//alias Base.get
I tried using override and it complained that the functions weren't overriding
anything. I think that the main problem is that the alias solution was designed
to
allow derived classes to use overloads that had already been defined in the base
class, not for the derived classes to add _new_
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 02:50:41 BLM wrote:
I tried using override and it complained that the functions weren't
overriding anything. I think that the main problem is that the alias
solution was designed to allow derived classes to use overloads that had
already been defined in the base
On 02/21/2012 06:21 PM, BLM wrote:
I'm working on a project where I'm using overloaded virtual methods, and I've
run into a challenge with overload sets.
My code looks something like this:
class Base {
void get(ubyte b) {};
}
class Derived: Base {
//alias Base.get get;
void get(string
I've submitted it to the DMD developers. Hopefully it won't take too long to get
fixed; it looks like it would be a _fairly_ simple fix to make. (Since when is a
compiler fix simple?)
Hmm... I guess I'll have to figure out why my code is behaving differently and
put
a test case together. Strange...
Thanks for fixing the semicolons. Old C++ habits die hard, even if one has
written
very little C++ :)
On 2012-02-22 03:39, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 02:21:43 BLM wrote:
I'm working on a project where I'm using overloaded virtual methods, and
I've run into a challenge with overload sets.
My code looks something like this:
class Base {
void get(ubyte b) {};
}
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 08:19:09 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
He is overloading, not overriding. You have to start notice the
difference when reading these posts :)
Well, it's both. He's overriding a base class function with a different
signature. So, depending on how the compiler treats
13 matches
Mail list logo
