On Friday, 8 September 2017 at 16:10:55 UTC, Biotronic wrote:
On Friday, 8 September 2017 at 12:32:35 UTC, Jiyan wrote:
[...]
It's scoped!T's destructor. If you decide to use that
workaround, you should probably copy scoped!T from std.typecons
and have your own version. It's not safe in all
On Friday, 8 September 2017 at 12:32:35 UTC, Jiyan wrote:
On Friday, 8 September 2017 at 06:37:54 UTC, Biotronic wrote:
On Thursday, 7 September 2017 at 23:40:11 UTC, Jiyan wrote:
[...]
Sadly, even std.typecons.scoped isn't currently @nogc:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13972
On Friday, 8 September 2017 at 06:37:54 UTC, Biotronic wrote:
On Thursday, 7 September 2017 at 23:40:11 UTC, Jiyan wrote:
[...]
Sadly, even std.typecons.scoped isn't currently @nogc:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13972
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17592
[...]
First
On Thursday, 7 September 2017 at 23:40:11 UTC, Jiyan wrote:
Hey,
wanted to know whether it is possible to make anonymous nogc
classes:
interface I
{
public void ap();
}
void exec(I i)
{
i.ap;
}
// now execute, but with something like `scope`
exec( new class I
{
int
Hey,
wanted to know whether it is possible to make anonymous nogc
classes:
interface I
{
public void ap();
}
void exec(I i)
{
i.ap;
}
// now execute, but with something like `scope`
exec( new class I
{
int tr = 43;
override void ap(){tr.writeln;}
});
Thanks
