On Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 00:55:42 UTC, NotSpooky wrote:
You already answered on the IRC so thanks X2.
So, it's problematic to have pointers to structs in all cases
according to spec?
Maybe... though in practice (and with C compatibility), pointers
to ones where you know the memory
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 23:08:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 22:57:22 UTC, NotSpooky wrote:
Is it undefined behavior to assign to a pointer in the
constructor of a struct?
Yes:
http://dlang.org/spec/struct.html
"A struct is defined to not have an
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 23:08:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 22:57:22 UTC, NotSpooky wrote:
Is it undefined behavior to assign to a pointer in the
constructor of a struct?
Yes:
http://dlang.org/spec/struct.html
"A struct is defined to not have an
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 22:57:22 UTC, NotSpooky wrote:
Is it undefined behavior to assign to a pointer in the
constructor of a struct?
Yes:
http://dlang.org/spec/struct.html
"A struct is defined to not have an identity; that is, the
implementation is free to make bit copies of the
Is it undefined behavior to assign to a pointer in the
constructor of a struct?
