On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 18:24:52 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 07/29/2016 02:15 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
And if it is a cross-platform library that is stdcall on
Windows and
cdecl elsewhere:
extern(C) void fun();
extern(System), no?
Yeah, that's what I had intended.
On 07/29/2016 02:15 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
And if it is a cross-platform library that is stdcall on Windows and
cdecl elsewhere:
extern(C) void fun();
extern(System), no?
On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 12:20:17 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Though, I should add the caveat that you need to ensure the
definition of the C function does not specify any parameters.
AFAIK, this is legal:
// foo.h
void func();
// foo.c
void func(int a, int b) { ... }
In which case you would
On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 12:15:22 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Yes, this is correct as long as the calling convention is not
stdcall or something else:
Though, I should add the caveat that you need to ensure the
definition of the C function does not specify any parameters.
AFAIK, this is lega
On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 10:57:37 UTC, ciechowoj wrote:
In C, a function `void func()` doesn't declare a function
without arguments, instead it declares a function that takes
unspecified number of arguments. The correct way to declare a
function that takes no arguments is to use the `void` ke
In C, a function `void func()` doesn't declare a function without
arguments, instead it declares a function that takes unspecified
number of arguments. The correct way to declare a function that
takes no arguments is to use the `void` keyword: `void
func(void)`.
What is the correct way to ref
