On Wednesday, October 2, 2019 11:22:40 AM MDT Just Dave via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> I was reading the C++ to D page, and came across this little bit
> about when to call the base class constructor:
>
> "It's superior to C++ in that the base constructor call can be
> flexibly placed anywhere
On Wednesday, 2 October 2019 at 17:22:40 UTC, Just Dave wrote:
I was reading the C++ to D page, and came across this little
bit about when to call the base class constructor:
Isn't there some inherent danger of not calling the base
constructor first?
The object's fields are pre-initialized
I was reading the C++ to D page, and came across this little bit
about when to call the base class constructor:
"It's superior to C++ in that the base constructor call can be
flexibly placed anywhere in the derived constructor."
Isn't there some inherent danger of not calling the base
