On 2015-06-16 18:36:09 +, Rob T said:
FYI:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11687
Thanks. We are currently experimenting to see how want to use the
threads and what code to refactor. If we are going to bite the bullet I
keep this
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 15:54:30 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On 2015-06-14 08:35, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Hi, just to x-check if I have the correct understanding:
fibers = look parallel, are sequential = use 1 CPU
core
threads = look parallel, are parallel = use several
CPU
On 2015-06-14 15:54:30 +, Etienne Cimon said:
Yes, however nothing really guarantees multi-threading = multi-core.
The kernel reserves the right and will most likely do everything
possible to keep your process core-local to use caching efficiently.
Hi, sure. It's more about raising the
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 12:35:44 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Hi, just to x-check if I have the correct understanding:
fibers = look parallel, are sequential = use 1 CPU core
threads = look parallel, are parallel = use several CPU cores
Is that right?
Pretty much.
On 2015-06-14 08:35, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Hi, just to x-check if I have the correct understanding:
fibers = look parallel, are sequential = use 1 CPU core
threads = look parallel, are parallel = use several CPU cores
Is that right?
Yes, however nothing really guarantees
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 12:35:44 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Hi, just to x-check if I have the correct understanding:
fibers = look parallel, are sequential = use 1 CPU core
threads = look parallel, are parallel = use several CPU cores
Is that right?
Fibers/co-routines
