On Sunday, 23 March 2014 at 12:43:35 UTC, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Uranuz
wrote:
Yes. I like it more that ivoking one function from another.
But this trick
not working in DMD 2.063 as I understand.
Is there any reason to still use 2.063 (honest question)? Th
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Uranuz wrote:
> Yes. I like it more that ivoking one function from another. But this trick
> not working in DMD 2.063 as I understand.
Is there any reason to still use 2.063 (honest question)? The current
one is 2.065 with .066 in alpha state. .063 is almost a y
On Sunday, 23 March 2014 at 11:15:13 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/23/14, Uranuz wrote:
I have a question how I could combine template parameters
deduction with setting default values for template parameters.
I
will start directly from a piece of code.
You can use eponymous templates for
On 3/23/14, Uranuz wrote:
> I have a question how I could combine template parameters
> deduction with setting default values for template parameters. I
> will start directly from a piece of code.
You can use eponymous templates for this. E.g.:
-
template decodeURICustom(string allowedSpecCh
string decodeURIHost(T)(T source)
{
}
But I like it less and I still don't know how to combine template
params deduction with setting second param.
string decodeURIHost(T, bool formEncoding)(T source) {}
I have a question how I could combine template parameters
deduction with setting default values for template parameters. I
will start directly from a piece of code.
string decodeURICustom(string allowedSpecChars = null, bool
formEncoding = false, T)(T source) pure
{
//Some processing
}
I
