Re: D support on SPARC/Solaris

2014-10-31 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 31 October 2014 at 16:10:01 UTC, Wyatt wrote: On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 15:39:55 UTC, Joakim wrote: You could look at the linux/powerpc work Kai did with ldc for an idea of the changes necessary for a new arch. Sounds fairly reasonable to me. Happen to have a link to a commi

Re: D support on SPARC/Solaris

2014-10-31 Thread Wyatt via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 15:39:55 UTC, Joakim wrote: Someone may have been thorough when adding arches to certain files, but that in no way implies much actual support. Looking closer, it's all ELF header stuff, so that sounds about right. You may be able to combine the existing Sol

Re: D support on SPARC/Solaris

2014-10-30 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 14:03:23 UTC, Wyatt wrote: At work, I have to target SPARC/Solaris. I'm writing code to interface with an internal network protocol, so my current choices are C and (old) C++ (remember Sun Studio? I wish I didn't have to). Having looked, it seems like there's

Re: D support on SPARC/Solaris

2014-10-30 Thread Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
DMD is for x86 AFAIK.

D support on SPARC/Solaris

2014-10-30 Thread Wyatt via Digitalmars-d-learn
At work, I have to target SPARC/Solaris. I'm writing code to interface with an internal network protocol, so my current choices are C and (old) C++ (remember Sun Studio? I wish I didn't have to). Having looked, it seems like there's some manner of support for SPARC in the runtime, but restri