On 15.12.2016 01:38, Basile B. wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 December 2016 at 22:06:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/14/2016 09:25 AM, Basile B. wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 at 23:37:59 UTC, Timon Gehr
wrote:
>> I usually do
>>
>> enum code = q{expr};
>> static
On Wednesday, 14 December 2016 at 22:06:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/14/2016 09:25 AM, Basile B. wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 at 23:37:59 UTC, Timon Gehr
wrote:
>> I usually do
>>
>> enum code = q{expr};
>> static if(__traits(compiles,mixin(code)))
>> fun(mixin(code));
>
>
On 12/14/2016 09:25 AM, Basile B. wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 at 23:37:59 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> I usually do
>>
>> enum code = q{expr};
>> static if(__traits(compiles,mixin(code)))
>> fun(mixin(code));
>
> Strangely if i put this in a templated enum that doesn't work.
> If
On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 at 23:37:59 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 14.12.2016 00:00, Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
what's the best (and DRY) way to achieve:
```
static if(__traits(compiles, expr))
fun(expr);
```
ie, without repeating the expression inside expr?
eg:
```
On 14.12.2016 00:00, Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
what's the best (and DRY) way to achieve:
```
static if(__traits(compiles, expr))
fun(expr);
```
ie, without repeating the expression inside expr?
eg:
```
static if(__traits(compiles, foo.bar[2])){
counter++;
writeln("
what's the best (and DRY) way to achieve:
```
static if(__traits(compiles, expr))
fun(expr);
```
ie, without repeating the expression inside expr?
eg:
```
static if(__traits(compiles, foo.bar[2])){
counter++;
writeln(" expr = ", foo.bar[2]);
}
```
