On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 13:25:37 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Now I can remove element from a array:
module removeOne;
import std.stdio;
import std.array;
import std.algorithm;
void main()
{
int[] aa =[1,2,3,4,5];
aa = aa[0..2] ~aa[3..$];
writeln(aa); //ok
Now I can remove element from a array:
module removeOne;
import std.stdio;
import std.array;
import std.algorithm;
void main()
{
int[] aa =[1,2,3,4,5];
aa = aa[0..2] ~aa[3..$];
writeln(aa); //ok
remove(aa,1);
writeln(aa);//get error result
}
You
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 13:55:59 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 13:29:30 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
Works as designed:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html#.remove
Thank you.
aa = remove(aa,1);//ok
but how to remove one item?
such as aa.remove(2) ?
I
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 13:29:30 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
Works as designed:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html#.remove
Thank you.
aa = remove(aa,1);//ok
but how to remove one item?
such as aa.remove(2) ?
Tobias Pankrath:
Works as designed:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html#.remove
Unfortunately it's one of the worst designed functions of Phobos:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10959
Bye,
bearophile
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 14:09:10 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tobias Pankrath:
Works as designed:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html#.remove
Unfortunately it's one of the worst designed functions of
Phobos:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10959
Bye,
bearophile
It
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 14:09:10 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tobias Pankrath:
Works as designed:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html#.remove
Unfortunately it's one of the worst designed functions of
Phobos:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10959
Bye,
bearophile
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 14:09:10 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Yes,A.remove(item) or A.removeAt(index)
They are better than now.
bachmeier:
It seems your argument is that remove is poorly designed
because it's not destructive. Or am I missing your argument?
It has to be a void function (or perhaps bettter it can return
true/false if it has removed the item, so it becomes @nogc and
nothrow).
And it has to remove the
On 2015-02-05 at 17:25, bearophile wrote:
It has to be a void function (or perhaps bettter it can return true/false if it
has removed the item, so it becomes @nogc and nothrow).
And it has to remove the first item equal to the given one.
You can then add a second function that removes at a
10 matches
Mail list logo
