On Tuesday, 5 July 2016 at 13:48:46 UTC, Claude wrote:
Ah ok. I tried using void[size] static array and it seems to
work without having to use GC.addRange().
Correct. void[] means the type of the data is unknown, so the GC
has to assume it can contain pointers.
This also means that _everythi
On Tuesday, 5 July 2016 at 12:43:14 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2016 at 10:04:05 UTC, Claude wrote:
So here's my question: Is it normal???
yes. `ubyte` arrays by definition cannot hold pointers, so GC
doesn't bother to scan 'em.
Ah ok. I tried using void[size] static array and it
On Tuesday, 5 July 2016 at 10:04:05 UTC, Claude wrote:
So here's my question: Is it normal???
yes. `ubyte` arrays by definition cannot hold pointers, so GC
doesn't bother to scan 'em.
Hello,
I've been working on some kind of allocator using a dynamic array
as a memory pool. I used emplace to allocate class instances
within that array, and I was surprised to see I had to use
GC.addRange() to avoid the GC to destroy stuff referenced in that
array.
Here's a chunk of code[1]
