On 05/06/2015 11:24 AM, Charles Hixson via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On 05/05/2015 11:49 AM, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On 05/05/2015 07:14 AM, bitwise wrote:
I don't see how someone could arrive at the above
solution without showing up here and asking first.
It was the
On 05/05/2015 11:49 AM, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On 05/05/2015 07:14 AM, bitwise wrote:
I don't see how someone could arrive at the above
solution without showing up here and asking first.
It was the same with me. :) Then I wrote a short section about it:
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 21:58:57 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Tue, 05 May 2015 17:33:09 -0400, Namespace
rswhi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've discussed that so many times... just search for auto /
scope ref... ;)
It will never happen.
See:
On Tue, 05 May 2015 18:58:34 -0400, Namespace rswhi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 21:58:57 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Tue, 05 May 2015 17:33:09 -0400, Namespace rswhi...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've discussed that so many times... just search for auto / scope
ref... ;)
It will never
On Tue, 05 May 2015 00:20:15 -0400, rsw0x anonym...@anonymous.com wrote:
it does, auto ref can bind to both lvalues and rvalues. Create the
function with an empty template like so,
import std.stdio;
struct S{
}
void Foo()(auto ref S s){
}
void main(){
S s;
Foo(s);
On Tue, 05 May 2015 10:44:13 -0400, rsw0x anonym...@anonymous.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 14:14:51 UTC, bitwise wrote:
Interesting.. Has this always worked? Theres a couple of forum
conversations about trying to get auto ref to work for non-templates.
The main problem seems to be
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 14:14:51 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Tue, 05 May 2015 00:20:15 -0400, rsw0x
anonym...@anonymous.com wrote:
it does, auto ref can bind to both lvalues and rvalues. Create
the function with an empty template like so,
import std.stdio;
struct S{
}
void Foo()(auto ref S s){
I am sorry for this post, I am just testing something.
On Tue, 05 May 2015 18:27:54 -0400, Gomen go...@asai.jp wrote:
I am sorry for this post, I am just testing something.
The retired D forum seems to have been re-purposed for testing ;)
Bit
On Tue, 05 May 2015 17:33:09 -0400, Namespace rswhi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've discussed that so many times... just search for auto / scope ref...
;)
It will never happen.
See:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ntsyfhesnywfxvzbe...@forum.dlang.org?page=1
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 02:47:03 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2015 00:16:03 -0400, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
D will move the argument if it can rather than copying it
(e.g. if a
temporary is being passed in), which reduces the need
On Tue, 05 May 2015 14:49:07 -0400, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/lvalue_rvalue.html#ix_lvalue_rvalue.auto%20ref,%20parameter
I've actually stumbled upon this site a few times, and it has been very
helpful, so thanks =D
Unfortunately though, I had no idea
On 05/05/2015 07:14 AM, bitwise wrote:
I don't see how someone could arrive at the above
solution without showing up here and asking first.
It was the same with me. :) Then I wrote a short section about it:
I've discussed that so many times... just search for auto / scope
ref... ;)
It will never happen.
See:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ntsyfhesnywfxvzbe...@forum.dlang.org?page=1
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ylebrhjnrrcajnvtt...@forum.dlang.org?page=1
On Tue, 05 May 2015 11:54:53 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 02:47:03 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2015 00:16:03 -0400, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
D will move the argument if it can
On Mon, 04 May 2015 00:16:03 -0400, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
D will move the argument if it can rather than copying it (e.g. if a
temporary is being passed in), which reduces the need for worrying about
copying like you tend to have to do
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 02:47:03 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2015 00:16:03 -0400, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
D will move the argument if it can rather than copying it
(e.g. if a
temporary is being passed in), which reduces the need
On Sunday, May 03, 2015 21:58:12 bitwise via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
If I have a large struct that needs to be passed around, like a 4x4 matrix
for example, how do I do that efficiently in D?
In std.datetime, in is used for most struct parameters, but I'm confused
by the docs for function
On Monday, 4 May 2015 at 01:58:12 UTC, bitwise wrote:
The documentation doesn't say anything about in being a
reference, but it doesn't say that out parameters are
references either, even though it's usage in the example
clearly shows that it is.
Thanks,
Bit
On Monday, 4 May 2015 at 03:57:04 UTC, bitwise wrote:
I'll probably go with in ref. I think escape proof is
probably a good default. Not to mention, easier to type ;)
FYI I'm unsure how well `scope` storage class is currently
implemented because it's in a state of flux at the moment as far
If I have a large struct that needs to be passed around, like a 4x4 matrix
for example, how do I do that efficiently in D?
In std.datetime, in is used for most struct parameters, but I'm confused
by the docs for function parameter storage classes[1].
In C++, I would pass a large struct as
On Monday, 4 May 2015 at 01:58:12 UTC, bitwise wrote:
If I have a large struct that needs to be passed around, like a
4x4 matrix for example, how do I do that efficiently in D?
In std.datetime, in is used for most struct parameters, but
I'm confused by the docs for function parameter storage
On Sun, 03 May 2015 22:37:52 -0400, rsw0x anonym...@anonymous.com wrote:
Use the ref storage class. You can use more than one storage class i.e,
foo(in ref int x)
Thanks, this should work.
On Sun, 03 May 2015 23:29:59 -0400, Baz bb.t...@gmx.com wrote:
it's specified in
23 matches
Mail list logo
