Re: Empty LST files?

2016-07-31 Thread Thalamus via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 17:01:32 UTC, Seb wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:55:52 UTC, Seb wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:48:52 UTC, Thalamus wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:08:49 UTC, Seb wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 15:30:46 UTC, Thalamus wrote: [...] How about

Re: Empty LST files?

2016-07-31 Thread Seb via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:55:52 UTC, Seb wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:48:52 UTC, Thalamus wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:08:49 UTC, Seb wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 15:30:46 UTC, Thalamus wrote: [...] How about setting the source path directly? With a recent enough

Re: Empty LST files?

2016-07-31 Thread Seb via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:48:52 UTC, Thalamus wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:08:49 UTC, Seb wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 15:30:46 UTC, Thalamus wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 14:03:49 UTC, Thalamus wrote: [...] After a couple more hours today, I found a couple of

Re: Empty LST files?

2016-07-31 Thread Thalamus via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:08:49 UTC, Seb wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 15:30:46 UTC, Thalamus wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 14:03:49 UTC, Thalamus wrote: [...] After a couple more hours today, I found a couple of solutions. Neither is satisfactory. [...] How about setting

Re: Empty LST files?

2016-07-31 Thread Seb via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 15:30:46 UTC, Thalamus wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 14:03:49 UTC, Thalamus wrote: [...] After a couple more hours today, I found a couple of solutions. Neither is satisfactory. [...] How about setting the source path directly? With a recent enough dmd

Re: Empty LST files?

2016-07-31 Thread Thalamus via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 14:03:49 UTC, Thalamus wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 10:05:04 UTC, Basile B. wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 08:29:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 01:10:40 UTC, Thalamus wrote: Any idea what I'm doing wrong? Yes, what's going wrong is

Re: Empty LST files?

2016-07-31 Thread Thalamus via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 10:05:04 UTC, Basile B. wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 08:29:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 01:10:40 UTC, Thalamus wrote: Any idea what I'm doing wrong? Yes, what's going wrong is quite actually you said that the LST is well generated but

Re: Empty LST files?

2016-07-31 Thread Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 08:29:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 01:10:40 UTC, Thalamus wrote: Any idea what I'm doing wrong? Yes, what's going wrong is quite actually you said that the LST is well generated but empty so my previous answer is wrong, also i was focused

Re: Empty LST files?

2016-07-31 Thread Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-learn
to the test EXE end up with empty LST files. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? Yes, what's going wrong is quite obvious. Coverage files are generated at run-time by the target application and not by the compiler at compile-time. In your options I can see that you generate an object file. You s

Empty LST files?

2016-07-30 Thread Thalamus via Digitalmars-d-learn
.dep" -c -odobj\Unit.build.rsp Interfaces.obj Invokers.obj (plus a whole lot of other .objs) This is for a test EXE. I thought there may be some trouble when generating files for the .d from the .obj files, but even the .d files local to the test EXE end up with empty LST files. Any idea