On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 17:01:32 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:55:52 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:48:52 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:08:49 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 15:30:46 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
[...]
How about
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:55:52 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:48:52 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:08:49 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 15:30:46 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
[...]
How about setting the source path directly? With a recent
enough
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:48:52 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:08:49 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 15:30:46 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 14:03:49 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
[...]
After a couple more hours today, I found a couple of
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 16:08:49 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 15:30:46 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 14:03:49 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
[...]
After a couple more hours today, I found a couple of
solutions. Neither is satisfactory.
[...]
How about setting
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 15:30:46 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 14:03:49 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
[...]
After a couple more hours today, I found a couple of solutions.
Neither is satisfactory.
[...]
How about setting the source path directly? With a recent enough
dmd
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 14:03:49 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 10:05:04 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 08:29:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 01:10:40 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
Yes, what's going wrong is
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 10:05:04 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 08:29:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 01:10:40 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
Yes, what's going wrong is quite
actually you said that the LST is well generated but
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 08:29:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 01:10:40 UTC, Thalamus wrote:
Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
Yes, what's going wrong is quite
actually you said that the LST is well generated but empty so my
previous answer is wrong, also i was focused
to the test EXE end up with empty LST files.
Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
Yes, what's going wrong is quite obvious. Coverage files are
generated at run-time by the target application and not by the
compiler at compile-time.
In your options I can see that you generate an object file. You
s
.dep" -c -odobj\Unit.build.rsp Interfaces.obj
Invokers.obj (plus a whole lot of other .objs)
This is for a test EXE. I thought there may be some trouble when
generating files for the .d from the .obj files, but even the .d
files local to the test EXE end up with empty LST files.
Any idea
10 matches
Mail list logo