On Saturday, 22 January 2022 at 19:06:38 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
No. Anything allocated with `new` is not thread local... and
even if it was, you can send the pointer to other threads
anyway.
The only things in thread local storage are the direct values
in the non-shared global variables.
On Saturday, 22 January 2022 at 18:55:30 UTC, Jaime wrote:
A) Do I need to worry about data being / not being in
thread-local storage?
No. Anything allocated with `new` is not thread local... and even
if it was, you can send the pointer to other threads anyway.
The only things in thread
Howdy.
How do I make sure data isn't allocated thread-local, if I also
want to immediately use it in a thread-local way, because, for
instance, I happen to already possess its intended mutex, which
was allocated before it?
Is this sufficient? Also, is it even something to worry about?
```d
