On Tuesday, 14 March 2017 at 19:14:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:59:58PM +, Inquie via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
[...]
> [...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
Keep in mind, though, that the above creates a function pointer
with the same signature as the member function
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:59:58PM +, Inquie via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 14 March 2017 at 17:42:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> > struct X {
> > int method(float x) { return 0; }
> > }
> >
> > typeof(&X.method) membptr;
> > pragma(msg, typeof(memb
On Tuesday, 14 March 2017 at 17:42:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:05:10PM +, Inquie via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I am generating member function pointers using the declaration
specified from a standard member function. The standard member
function is a valid D functi
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:05:10PM +, Inquie via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I am generating member function pointers using the declaration
> specified from a standard member function. The standard member
> function is a valid D function that could use any types.
>
> Is there any pitfalls lik
I am generating member function pointers using the declaration
specified from a standard member function. The standard member
function is a valid D function that could use any types.
Is there any pitfalls like there are in C++ from generating a
function pointer from them?
e.g.,
X foo(A,B,C)
