On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 08:44:53 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
It would be interesting to test whether those methods handle
these scenarios.
Yeah, it doesn't work.
https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/55116efd0c9c
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 12:20:08 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/1/18 7:05 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 10:10:27 UTC, John Burton wrote:
My question is how do I tell if a pointer is "garbage
collected" or not?
You could try `GC.addrOf()` or `GC.query()`
On Thursday, March 01, 2018 15:53:08 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On 3/1/18 3:33 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Won't a precise GC scanning for pointers to aligned objects want to skip
> > values that can't be an aligned pointer? Though in D's case, being
> > required to be
On 3/1/18 3:33 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:52:26PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
There are a few in there, which I think are over-the-top. Such as
"don't cast a pointer to a non-pointer",
[...]
Isn't that necessary for a precise GC?
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:52:26PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> There are a few in there, which I think are over-the-top. Such as
> "don't cast a pointer to a non-pointer",
[...]
Isn't that necessary for a precise GC?
Also, AIUI the current GC already does
On Thursday, March 01, 2018 14:52:26 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On 3/1/18 2:04 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 01, 2018 10:55:34 Steven Schveighoffer via
> > Digitalmars-d->
> > learn wrote:
> >> It should really say that it's up to the GC
On 3/1/18 2:04 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 01, 2018 10:55:34 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
It should really say that it's up to the GC implementation whether it's UB
or not.
Well, that arguably makes it UB in general then, because it can't be relied
On Thursday, March 01, 2018 10:55:34 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> It should really say that it's up to the GC implementation whether it's UB
> or not.
Well, that arguably makes it UB in general then, because it can't be relied
on. By putting restrictions on the GC in
On 3/1/18 10:35 AM, John Burton wrote:
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 12:20:08 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/1/18 7:05 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 10:10:27 UTC, John Burton wrote:
My question is how do I tell if a pointer is "garbage collected" or
not?
You
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 12:20:08 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/1/18 7:05 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 10:10:27 UTC, John Burton wrote:
My question is how do I tell if a pointer is "garbage
collected" or not?
You could try `GC.addrOf()` or `GC.query()`
On 3/1/18 7:05 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 10:10:27 UTC, John Burton wrote:
My question is how do I tell if a pointer is "garbage collected" or not?
You could try `GC.addrOf()` or `GC.query()` in core.memory.
I was going to say this, but then I realized, it's not
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 10:10:27 UTC, John Burton wrote:
My question is how do I tell if a pointer is "garbage
collected" or not?
You could try `GC.addrOf()` or `GC.query()` in core.memory.
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 10:10:27 UTC, John Burton wrote:
In the language spec here :-
https://dlang.org/spec/garbage.html#pointers_and_gc
It refers to a distinction between pointers to garbage
collected memory and pointers that are not. In particular it
says that with a non garbage
On 01/03/2018 11:10 PM, John Burton wrote:
In the language spec here :-
https://dlang.org/spec/garbage.html#pointers_and_gc
It refers to a distinction between pointers to garbage collected memory
and pointers that are not. In particular it says that with a non garbage
collected pointer you
In the language spec here :-
https://dlang.org/spec/garbage.html#pointers_and_gc
It refers to a distinction between pointers to garbage collected
memory and pointers that are not. In particular it says that with
a non garbage collected pointer you can do anything that is
legal in C but with
15 matches
Mail list logo
