On 19.08.2010 22:07, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
And, looking in my codebase, here is what I'm using ;)
template Init(T...)
{
T Init;
}
It's so simple...
I think I found this before the bug report and then forgot about it and
copied an old version. I'll update the bug report
Hi,
I want to do exactly the same as described in
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4536 . The problem is I
can't even get the workaround to work. Dmd complains about the following
template:
---
template Init(T...)
{
alias
Johannes Pfau s...@example.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to do exactly the same as described in
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4536 . The problem is I
can't even get the workaround to work. Dmd complains about the following
template:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 21:51, Simen kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.comwrote:
Johannes Pfau s...@example.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to do exactly the same as described in
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4536 . The problem is I
can't even get the workaround to work. Dmd complains
Philippe Sigaud philippe.sig...@gmail.com wrote:
And, looking in my codebase, here is what I'm using ;)
template Init(T...)
{
T Init;
}
Doh. I believe this is slightly better, though:
template Init( T... ) {
enum T Init;
}
:p
--
Simen
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 22:16, Simen kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.comwrote:
Philippe Sigaud philippe.sig...@gmail.com wrote:
And, looking in my codebase, here is what I'm using ;)
template Init(T...)
{
T Init;
}
Doh. I believe this is slightly better, though:
template Init( T... )
Philippe Sigaud philippe.sig...@gmail.com wrote:
What, that's *five* more characters, five! I win, I win!
;'(
More seriously, yours might be more 'solid', but isn't enum implicit in
this
case?
Seems you are right. I thought the template would work as a namespace,
giving this situation:
