On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 02:33:20 UTC, lobo wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 02:18:47 UTC, TheFlyingFiddle
wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 01:22:04 UTC, lobo wrote:
Hi,
I'm coming from C++ and wondered if the pattern below has an
equivalent in D using structs. I could j
On 2016-10-12 03:22, lobo wrote:
Hi,
I'm coming from C++ and wondered if the pattern below has an equivalent
in D using structs. I could just use classes and leave it up to the
caller to use scoped! as well but I'm not sure how that will play out
when others start using my lib.
Thanks,
lobo
m
On 2016-10-12 04:33, lobo wrote:
This approach works nicely although it feels clumsy but that's probably
just because I'm so used to C++. It also handles private members as I'd
expect, i.e. they're not accessible outside module scope through the
alias struct instance, but there is no protected.
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 02:18:47 UTC, TheFlyingFiddle
wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 01:22:04 UTC, lobo wrote:
Hi,
I'm coming from C++ and wondered if the pattern below has an
equivalent in D using structs. I could just use classes and
leave it up to the caller to use scoped
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 02:18:47 UTC, TheFlyingFiddle
wrote:
void foo(ref ABase base)
{
base.ival = 32;
}
This should be:
void foo(ref Base1 base)
{
base.ival = 32;
}
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 01:22:04 UTC, lobo wrote:
Hi,
I'm coming from C++ and wondered if the pattern below has an
equivalent in D using structs. I could just use classes and
leave it up to the caller to use scoped! as well but I'm not
sure how that will play out when others start us
Hi,
I'm coming from C++ and wondered if the pattern below has an
equivalent in D using structs. I could just use classes and leave
it up to the caller to use scoped! as well but I'm not sure how
that will play out when others start using my lib.
Thanks,
lobo
module A;
class Base1 {
in
