On Saturday, October 27, 2012 12:34:28 simendsjo wrote:
> So something like this then?
Whatever you need for what you're trying to do. If your example templates test
what you need tested, then they should work, though I confess that for
something like division, it seems to me to be overkill to c
On Saturday, 27 October 2012 at 10:07:20 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, October 27, 2012 11:58:57 simendsjo wrote:
The thing is that I often doesn't really care about the type,
only that it exposes certain properties.
Then create a template constraint (or eponymous template to use
On Saturday, October 27, 2012 11:58:57 simendsjo wrote:
> The thing is that I often doesn't really care about the type,
> only that it exposes certain properties.
Then create a template constraint (or eponymous template to use in a template
constraint) which tests for those properties. That's exa
On Friday, 26 October 2012 at 16:32:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 26, 2012 15:55:34 simendsjo wrote:
So.. What do I need to implement for a struct to be a valid
built-in type?
All valid properties (min, max etc) and operators for that
type?
So, you want stuff like isFloat
On Friday, October 26, 2012 15:55:34 simendsjo wrote:
> So.. What do I need to implement for a struct to be a valid
> built-in type?
> All valid properties (min, max etc) and operators for that type?
So, you want stuff like isFloatingPoint and isNumeric to return true for a
user-defined struct? T
On Friday, 26 October 2012 at 13:55:35 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
Not sure if this is a bug or intended behavior:
...
So.. What do I need to implement for a struct to be a valid
built-in type?
All valid properties (min, max etc) and operators for that type?
I am looking for something similar. I ende
Not sure if this is a bug or intended behavior:
import std.traits;
struct S {
int i;
T opCast(T)() if(isFloatingPoint!T) {
return cast(T)i;
}
}
template myIsFloatingPoint(T) {
enum myIsFloatingPoint = isFloatingPoint!T
|| __traits(compiles, { cast(real)T.in
