On 04/19/2012 11:55 PM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 21:33:46 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
Unfortunately the patch is incomplete. (template parameter matching is
not implemented afaik and it does not work for structs)
Ah, didn't know about the template blocker, but how should it
On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 21:33:46 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
Unfortunately the patch is incomplete. (template parameter
matching is not implemented afaik and it does not work for
structs)
Ah, didn't know about the template blocker, but how should it
work for structs? Shouldn't the syntax onl
On 04/19/2012 11:11 PM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
Fixing std.concurrency entails fixing std.variant which entails fixing
std.typecons.Rebindable by moving its functionality into the language
where it belongs.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3
This one has been lurking around foreve
On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 16:26:19 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04/19/2012 03:27 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
The program:
import std.concurrency ;
import std.stdio ;
/*immutable*/ struct X { int i ; }
void printI ( ) {
receive (
( X x
On 04/19/2012 03:27 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
The program:
import std.concurrency ;
import std.stdio ;
/*immutable*/ struct X { int i ; }
void printI ( ) {
receive (
( X x ) { writeln ( x.i ) ; }
) ;
The program:
import std.concurrency ;
import std.stdio ;
/*immutable*/ struct X { int i ; }
void printI ( ) {
receive (
( X x ) { writeln ( x.i ) ; }
) ;
}
int main ( immutabl