Re: Internationalization vs. Unicode

2013-04-29 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Monday, 29 April 2013 at 18:36:32 UTC, Tyro[17] wrote: This might work. Not sure yet. The first thing that caught my eyes is You'll find the ported Java source: https://github.com/d-widget-toolkit/base/tree/master/src

Re: Internationalization vs. Unicode

2013-04-29 Thread Tyro[17]
On 4/27/13 6:37 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2013-04-27 00:09, Tyro[17] wrote: There are myriad encoding schemes. D natively supports Unicode and provide functionality via phobos. A byproduct of this is that since ASCII is a subset of Unicode, it also natively support ASCII. This is a plus for t

Re: Internationalization vs. Unicode

2013-04-27 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-04-27 00:09, Tyro[17] wrote: There are myriad encoding schemes. D natively supports Unicode and provide functionality via phobos. A byproduct of this is that since ASCII is a subset of Unicode, it also natively support ASCII. This is a plus for the language but what of the other encoding

Re: Internationalization vs. Unicode

2013-04-26 Thread H. S. Teoh
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 06:09:48PM -0400, Tyro[17] wrote: > There are myriad encoding schemes. D natively supports Unicode and > provide functionality via phobos. A byproduct of this is that since > ASCII is a subset of Unicode, it also natively support ASCII. This > is a plus for the language but

Internationalization vs. Unicode

2013-04-26 Thread Tyro[17]
There are myriad encoding schemes. D natively supports Unicode and provide functionality via phobos. A byproduct of this is that since ASCII is a subset of Unicode, it also natively support ASCII. This is a plus for the language but what of the other encoding schemes? What library functionality