On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 14:20:03 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/25/2019 05:46 AM, Oleg B wrote:
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 12:34:15 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Those restrictions don't stop at runtime.
It's vary sad.
What reason for such restrictions? It's fundamental idea or
On Thursday, July 25, 2019 6:13:38 PM MDT Mike Franklin via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 18:37:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > There's probably at least one bug report on it, but as I
> > understand it, it's not a bug in the sense that the
> > implementation is
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 12:46:48 UTC, Oleg B wrote:
What reason for such restrictions? It's fundamental idea or
temporary implementation?
I think it's a dmd limitation. Currently it has a bug that it can
still generate code for ctfe templated functions, and they will
fail to link if
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 18:37:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
There's probably at least one bug report on it, but as I
understand it, it's not a bug in the sense that the
implementation is currently expected to handle such a case.
It's an area where betterC should be improved upon, but
On Thursday, July 25, 2019 8:20:03 AM MDT Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On 07/25/2019 05:46 AM, Oleg B wrote:
> > On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 12:34:15 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
> >> Those restrictions don't stop at runtime.
> >
> > It's vary sad.
> >
> > What reason for such
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 18:06:02 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 12:46:48 UTC, Oleg B wrote:
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 12:34:15 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Those restrictions don't stop at runtime.
It's vary sad.
What reason for such restrictions? It's
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 12:46:48 UTC, Oleg B wrote:
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 12:34:15 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Those restrictions don't stop at runtime.
It's vary sad.
What reason for such restrictions? It's fundamental idea or
temporary implementation?
Yes it is very sad.
On 07/25/2019 05:46 AM, Oleg B wrote:
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 12:34:15 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Those restrictions don't stop at runtime.
It's vary sad.
What reason for such restrictions? It's fundamental idea or temporary
implementation?
It looks like a bug to me.
Ali
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 12:34:15 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Those restrictions don't stop at runtime.
It's vary sad.
What reason for such restrictions? It's fundamental idea or
temporary implementation?
On 26/07/2019 12:30 AM, Oleg B wrote:
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 12:20:04 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
If you read the documentation for betterC
(https://dlang.org/spec/betterc.html#consequences) you'll see that
there are features of the D language which are not supported.
Therefore,
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 12:20:04 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
If you read the documentation for betterC
(https://dlang.org/spec/betterc.html#consequences) you'll see
that there are features of the D language which are not
supported. Therefore, libraries that use such features (e.g.
On Thursday, 25 July 2019 at 12:01:40 UTC, Oleg B wrote:
Hello everyone!
I try build this code with betterC
import core.stdc.stdio;
import std.format : format;
extern(C) int main()
{
mixin(format!`enum str = "%s\0";`("hello"));
fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", str.ptr);
return 0;
}
but
Hello everyone!
I try build this code with betterC
import core.stdc.stdio;
import std.format : format;
extern(C) int main()
{
mixin(format!`enum str = "%s\0";`("hello"));
fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", str.ptr);
return 0;
}
but compilation fails
13 matches
Mail list logo
