On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 12:03:16 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 09:47:54 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 09:39:45 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 09:07:32 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 12:03:16 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
I don't know how this works, someone has to propose it, clean
it up and respond to feedback I guess.
Glancing briefly at the source, it appears (from what I saw)
it's heavily based on doubling the size of a lower type (2 64's
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 09:47:54 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 09:39:45 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 09:07:32 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
https://github.com/d-gamedev-team/gfm/blob/master/integers/gfm/integers/wideint.d
wideint was exactly what I
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 09:39:45 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 09:07:32 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
https://github.com/d-gamedev-team/gfm/blob/master/integers/gfm/integers/wideint.d
wideint was exactly what I was looking for! Thank you so much :)
I WANT! If this does
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 09:07:32 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 07:40:08 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Saturday, 21 May 2016 at 09:43:38 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
I see that 'cent' and 'ucent' are reserved for future use but
not yet implemented. Does anyone have a
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 07:40:08 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Saturday, 21 May 2016 at 09:43:38 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
I see that 'cent' and 'ucent' are reserved for future use but
not yet implemented. Does anyone have a working implementation
of these types?
Alternatively, is there an
On Saturday, 21 May 2016 at 09:43:38 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
I see that 'cent' and 'ucent' are reserved for future use but
not yet implemented. Does anyone have a working implementation
of these types?
Alternatively, is there an any effort towards implementation of
arbitrary-sized integers
On Saturday, 21 May 2016 at 09:56:51 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Saturday, 21 May 2016 at 09:43:38 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
I see that 'cent' and 'ucent' are reserved for future use but
not yet implemented. Does anyone have a working implementation
of these types?
Alternatively, is there an
?
The keywords are reserved for future use not in current use.
So, no, there are no 128-bit integer types in D currently. It's
just that we left the door open for ourselves to add them later
without breaking programs due to having to create a new keyword.
Alternatively, is there an any effort towards
t use. So, no, there
are no 128-bit integer types in D currently. It's just that we left the door
open for ourselves to add them later without breaking programs due to having
to create a new keyword.
> Alternatively, is there an any effort towards implementation of
> arbitrary-sized integers in Pho
I see that 'cent' and 'ucent' are reserved for future use but not
yet implemented. Does anyone have a working implementation of
these types?
Alternatively, is there an any effort towards implementation of
arbitrary-sized integers in Phobos?
Thanks,
Saurabh
On Saturday, 21 May 2016 at 09:43:38 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
I see that 'cent' and 'ucent' are reserved for future use but
not yet implemented. Does anyone have a working implementation
of these types?
Alternatively, is there an any effort towards implementation of
arbitrary-sized integers
12 matches
Mail list logo
