On Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 10:51:27 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
If I understand correctly, you want to measure how many cycles
pass, rather than clock time?
Something like that. Well, I would also like to eliminate
differences based on different memory caches between machines.
In addition,
On Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 11:06:17 UTC, Dennis wrote:
You can make a reference program that you use to get a measure
for how fast the computer is that you run the benchmark on.
Then you can use that to scale your actual benchmark results.
When testing regressions there's a fairly obvious
On Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 10:21:07 UTC, Dukc wrote:
Is there some way to measure the performance of a function so
that the results will be same in different computers (all x86,
but otherwise different processors)? I'm thinking of making a
test suite that could find performance regressions
On Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 10:21:07 UTC, Dukc wrote:
Is there some way to measure the performance of a function so
that the results will be same in different computers (all x86,
but otherwise different processors)? I'm thinking of making a
test suite that could find performance regressions
Is there some way to measure the performance of a function so
that the results will be same in different computers (all x86,
but otherwise different processors)? I'm thinking of making a
test suite that could find performance regressions automatically.
I figured out Bochs[1] could be used for
