Hi!
Suppose I have a small .d script that has a main. Is there any
simple way to just run the unit tests without running main at all?
I thought -main switch was intended for this, but apparently it
works only if there's no main defined at all, otherwise, it
issues a double main definition
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 07:59:33 UTC, Sergei Nosov wrote:
Hi!
Suppose I have a small .d script that has a main. Is there any
simple way to just run the unit tests without running main at
all?
Here's the first thing that came to mind:
If you never want to both unit tests and regular
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 08:22:04 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 07:59:33 UTC, Sergei Nosov wrote:
Hi!
Suppose I have a small .d script that has a main. Is there any
simple way to just run the unit tests without running main at
all?
Here's the first thing that came to
On 3/16/14, Sergei Nosov sergei.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Thx! That's better, but I think -main switch could be made to
work like 'add or replace main by stub' instead of just 'add'. I
don't think it'll hurt anybody, what do you think?
It can't work, because main could be stored in a pre-built
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 10:15:00 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
It can't work, because main could be stored in a pre-built
object or
static library that's passed to DMD.
Hmm I really should consider making a DIP for a deferred CTFE
block. Could really come in handy for a situation like
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 12:57:04 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 10:15:00 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
It can't work, because main could be stored in a pre-built
object or
static library that's passed to DMD.
Hmm I really should consider making a DIP for a
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 20:22:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 12:57:04 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 10:15:00 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
It can't work, because main could be stored in a pre-built
object or
static library that's passed to DMD.
