On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 21:34:36 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 9/30/12, jerro wrote:
I think this should work:
template returnsRef(alias f)
{
enum bool returnsRef = is(typeof(
{
ParameterTypeTuple!f param;
auto ptr = &f(param);
}));
}
Yep. We should
Thanks!
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 21:20:40 UTC, jerro wrote:
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 20:51:54 UTC, mist wrote:
Thanks!
Unfortunately, return type issue is more important in my case.
I'll check if implementation from ParameterStorageClassTuple
can be adapted for return types thou
On 9/30/12, jerro wrote:
> I think this should work:
>
> template returnsRef(alias f)
> {
> enum bool returnsRef = is(typeof(
> {
> ParameterTypeTuple!f param;
> auto ptr = &f(param);
> }));
> }
Yep. We should add this to Phobos imo.
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 20:51:54 UTC, mist wrote:
Thanks!
Unfortunately, return type issue is more important in my case.
I'll check if implementation from ParameterStorageClassTuple
can be adapted for return types though.
I think this should work:
template returnsRef(alias f)
{
e
Thanks!
Unfortunately, return type issue is more important in my case.
I'll check if implementation from ParameterStorageClassTuple can
be adapted for return types though.
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 20:37:14 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 9/30/12, mist wrote:
How can I:
1) check if fu
On 9/30/12, mist wrote:
> How can I:
> 1) check if function returns by ref
> 2) check if function parameters are ref
> ..outside of function body. Is parsing typeof(func).stringof only
> valid option?
>
See ParameterStorageClassTuple in std.traits
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_traits.html
I'm not
How can I:
1) check if function returns by ref
2) check if function parameters are ref
..outside of function body. Is parsing typeof(func).stringof only
valid option?
