On 9/8/25 12:55 PM, Neto wrote:
> On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 16:51:09 UTC, Serg Gini wrote:
>> On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 16:43:10 UTC, Neto wrote:
>> Yes, I know there are companies that are using it in production.
>> Even several big ones like Weka and Symmetry.
> Why isn't D productio
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 20:10:52 UTC, Sergey wrote:
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 19:55:20 UTC, Neto wrote:
Why isn't D production ready?
One has to ask why to choose a production language.
1. First one has to be aware that it exists.
a. See Eiffel and D
Eiffel has been in prod
On Tuesday, 9 September 2025 at 21:08:59 UTC, drug007 wrote:
On 09.09.2025 01:53, Kapendev wrote:
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 21:25:25 UTC, drug007 wrote:
On 08.09.2025 22:55, Neto wrote:
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 16:51:09 UTC, Serg Gini wrote:
And not sure if ecosystem was a signifi
On Wednesday, 10 September 2025 at 03:46:37 UTC, felixfxu wrote:
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 20:10:52 UTC, Sergey wrote:
being focused on required important tasks = complicated
I don't quite understand the item above. What's dlang's
`"required important tasks"` now?
This one actually ove
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 20:10:52 UTC, Sergey wrote:
being focused on required important tasks = complicated
I don't quite understand the item above. What's dlang's
`"required important tasks"` now?
On 09.09.2025 01:53, Kapendev wrote:
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 21:25:25 UTC, drug007 wrote:
On 08.09.2025 22:55, Neto wrote:
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 16:51:09 UTC, Serg Gini wrote:
And not sure if ecosystem was a significant weight in the decision.
Why isn't D production ready?
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 16:51:09 UTC, Serg Gini wrote:
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 16:43:10 UTC, Neto wrote:
[...]
It is an old news now.
They decided to use Go, because it was closer to the language
of their initial implementation (TypeScript).
D is expensive for production in mo
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 21:25:25 UTC, drug007 wrote:
On 08.09.2025 22:55, Neto wrote:
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 16:51:09 UTC, Serg Gini wrote:
And not sure if ecosystem was a significant weight in the
decision.
Why isn't D production ready?
I've been trying to figure it out fo
On 9/8/25 9:51 AM, Serg Gini wrote:
> So I don't think they were considering D at all. Most probably they had
> some short-list of the language that their team knows and that are
> suitable for the task.
In my experience, such project "decisions" are rationalizations after
the fact. Like in mos
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 19:55:20 UTC, Neto wrote:
Why isn't D production ready?
For this type of questions is kinda hard to prepare a short
answer..
So instead of direct answer consider to check this equation:
Being production ready is a hard/complicated target..
large language = co
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 16:43:10 UTC, Neto wrote:
this is the reasoning
https://github.com/microsoft/typescript-go/discussions/411
I wonder if they did consider D language. First comment says
why Rust would be a good choice "If not C#, I would have
expected Rust, since that's where the
On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 16:43:10 UTC, Neto wrote:
this is the reasoning
https://github.com/microsoft/typescript-go/discussions/411
I wonder if they did consider D language. First comment says
why Rust would be a good choice "If not C#, I would have
expected Rust, since that's where the
this is the reasoning
https://github.com/microsoft/typescript-go/discussions/411
I wonder if they did consider D language. First comment says why
Rust would be a good choice "If not C#, I would have expected
Rust, since that's where the rest of the ecosystem is. So,
another surprise there." i
13 matches
Mail list logo
