On 11/06/2015 04:56 PM, BBaz wrote:
On Thursday, 5 November 2015 at 13:20:26 UTC, ixid wrote:
This may have been overlooked in my other thread so I wanted to ask
again:
This seems very inconsistent, does a += b not lower to a = a + b? I
guess not based on the below:
ushort a = ushort.max,
On Thursday, 5 November 2015 at 13:20:26 UTC, ixid wrote:
This may have been overlooked in my other thread so I wanted to
ask again:
This seems very inconsistent, does a += b not lower to a = a +
b? I guess not based on the below:
ushort a = ushort.max, b = ushort.max;
a += b; //
On Saturday, 7 November 2015 at 01:10:01 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 11/06/2015 04:56 PM, BBaz wrote:
On Thursday, 5 November 2015 at 13:20:26 UTC, ixid wrote:
[...]
What's inconsistent is the integral promotion of the add
expression
result that stops from 4 bytes int:
---
int a, b;
a +=
On 11/05/2015 05:20 AM, ixid wrote:
> This seems very inconsistent, does a += b not lower to a = a + b?
Apparently not:
http://dlang.org/expression.html#AssignExpression
It says "The right operand is implicitly converted to the type of the
left operand". So, the rules are different.
Ali
This may have been overlooked in my other thread so I wanted to
ask again:
This seems very inconsistent, does a += b not lower to a = a + b?
I guess not based on the below:
ushort a = ushort.max, b = ushort.max;
a += b; // Compiles fine
a = a + b; // Error: cannot implicitly
