On 12/03/2015 04:23 PM, Jim Barnett wrote:
> The `import` statement inside the `for`-loop kind of smells to me.
In addition to what others have explained, local imports are necessary
for template mixins:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/mixin.html#ix_mixin.import,%20local
Quoting:
module a;
im
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 03:33:55 UTC, Meta wrote:
I have never seen a language that encourages the user to
specify dependencies inside a loop. I am hoping I
misunderstood something here.
Sorry, I thought you were referring more generally to nested
imports. No, imports in a while loop ar
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 01:10:41 UTC, Jim Barnett wrote:
Really? If it leads to "hard to detect errors", I have a hard
time believing that can be "idiomatic D".
It's used throughout the standard library, granted I don't think
there's any occurrences of importing inside a while loop. The
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 00:50:17 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 00:26:23 UTC, Jim Barnett wrote:
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 00:23:45 UTC, Jim Barnett wrote:
The `import` statement inside the `for`-loop kind of smells
to me.
Sorry, inside the `while` loop
In D it's
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 00:50:17 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 00:26:23 UTC, Jim Barnett wrote:
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 00:23:45 UTC, Jim Barnett wrote:
The `import` statement inside the `for`-loop kind of smells
to me.
Sorry, inside the `while` loop
In D it's
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 00:26:23 UTC, Jim Barnett wrote:
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 00:23:45 UTC, Jim Barnett wrote:
The `import` statement inside the `for`-loop kind of smells to
me.
Sorry, inside the `while` loop
In D it's considered idiomatic, but it can also cause some very
h
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 00:23:45 UTC, Jim Barnett wrote:
The `import` statement inside the `for`-loop kind of smells to
me.
Sorry, inside the `while` loop
On Thursday, 3 December 2015 at 23:42:31 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Thursday, 3 December 2015 at 21:40:05 UTC, Jim Barnett wrote:
Thanks for reading.
My version slightly adjusted version:
/** Returns: If range is a palindrome larger than $(D
minLength).
See also:
http://forum.dlang.org/thr
On Thursday, 3 December 2015 at 21:40:05 UTC, Jim Barnett wrote:
Thanks for reading.
My version slightly adjusted version:
/** Returns: If range is a palindrome larger than $(D minLength).
See also:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/dlfeiszyweafpjioc...@forum.dlang.org#post-vpzuaqxvtdpzpeuor
On Thursday, 3 December 2015 at 22:14:02 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
I don't think you want reverse because it works in-place; you'd
need to make a copy to compare against. std.range.retro is
probably what you're looking for:
bool isPalindrome(R)(R range) if (isBidirectionalRange!R)
{
re
s a shorter expression to detect
> palindromes if efficiency isn't the primary concern. So I am interested
> in seeing implementations of `isPalindrome` that utilize
> `std.algorithm.mutation.reverse`, or anyone who cares to enlighten me
> why that might be a misguided thing to wa
urn true;
}
I recognize it's more efficient in terms of CPU time and memory
than my C++ solution, but I suspect there is a shorter expression
to detect palindromes if efficiency isn't the primary concern. So
I am interested in seeing implementations of `isP
12 matches
Mail list logo
