Am Sat, 22 Jun 2013 23:27:00 +0200
schrieb bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com:
Ali Çehreli:
The code compiles under 32-bit (e.g. with the -m32 compiler
switch) where size_t is an alias of uint.
Oh, I see. I compile most of the code on a 32 bit system.
I asked Walter to warn d
On Saturday, 22 June 2013 at 21:27:01 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Ali Çehreli:
The code compiles under 32-bit (e.g. with the -m32 compiler
switch) where size_t is an alias of uint.
Thanks, Ali! I'm always compiling on 64 bit systems; I'll add the
32 bit switch to my diagnostic approach now.
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 11:30:00 UTC, Jos van Uden wrote:
On 16-2-2013 8:58, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 06:58:01 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 02:23:42 UTC, Jos van Uden
wrote:
On 5-2-2013 20:45, Jos van Uden wrote:
By the way, I think 'Qznc'
Brian Rogoff:
The current D code for Dining philosophers does not compile
with dmd v2.063.2, the error message being
dining.d(34): Error: cannot uniquely infer foreach argument
types
I try to keep the D entries on Rosettacode updated, but every dmd
release breaks tons of code, and
On 06/22/2013 11:53 AM, Brian Rogoff wrote:
The current D code for Dining philosophers does not compile with dmd
v2.063.2, the error message being
dining.d(34): Error: cannot uniquely infer foreach argument types
The code compiles under 32-bit (e.g. with the -m32 compiler switch)
where
Ali Çehreli:
The code compiles under 32-bit (e.g. with the -m32 compiler
switch) where size_t is an alias of uint.
Oh, I see. I compile most of the code on a 32 bit system.
I asked Walter to warn d programmers against such mistakes, and
Walter closed it down. Someone else has opened the ER
I asked Walter to warn d programmers against such mistakes, and
Walter closed it down. Someone else has opened the ER again...
I meant this:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5063
In the meantime I have fixed the Rosettacode entry.
Bye,
bearophile
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 06:58:01 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 02:23:42 UTC, Jos van Uden
wrote:
On 5-2-2013 20:45, Jos van Uden wrote:
By the way, I think 'Qznc' may want to have a look at 'The
dining
philosophers':
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 07:58:56 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 06:58:01 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 02:23:42 UTC, Jos van Uden
wrote:
On 5-2-2013 20:45, Jos van Uden wrote:
By the way, I think 'Qznc' may want to have a look at 'The
dining
monarch_dodra:
I'm reporting it instead of correcting it directly, so as to
better explain how and why.
Thank you, some bugs are interesting. I will change the code.
Bye,
bearophile
On 16-2-2013 8:58, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 06:58:01 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 02:23:42 UTC, Jos van Uden wrote:
On 5-2-2013 20:45, Jos van Uden wrote:
By the way, I think 'Qznc' may want to have a look at 'The dining
philosophers':
On 5-2-2013 20:45, Jos van Uden wrote:
By the way, I think 'Qznc' may want to have a look at 'The dining
philosophers':
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Dining_philosophers
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 02:23:42 UTC, Jos van Uden wrote:
On 5-2-2013 20:45, Jos van Uden wrote:
By the way, I think 'Qznc' may want to have a look at 'The
dining
philosophers':
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Dining_philosophers
Am I the new rosetta concurency guy? :)
I should find
13 matches
Mail list logo
