://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1019#issuecomment-11836011
Kenji says, that the pull is a basic _proposal_.
What does this mean? It isn't merged until we made a final
discussion and decision about that? :/
I thought that this is the solution for all C++ rvalue ref
problems. Am i
Thanks for your answer. That explains my question.
I would love to see an official statement about this pull and
this feature. But neither in the related threads or here in
learn I get such statement. That is very sad because this
feature is very important and long discussed.
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 13:42:36 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Thanks for your answer. That explains my question.
I would love to see an official statement about this pull and
this feature. But neither in the related threads or here in
learn I get such statement. That is very sad because this
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 13:51:27 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 13:42:36 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Thanks for your answer. That explains my question.
I would love to see an official statement about this pull and
this feature. But neither in the related threads or
break *cough* valid *cough* existing code.
This wasn't really a new/changed feature that broke your code.
It was just something that worked that never should have worked.
Ok, ok, it wasn't a valid solution but it was the only solution
for handy programming with structs. We have still nothing
I have now seen something I've probably overlooked before.
Here:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1019#issuecomment-11836011
Kenji says, that the pull is a basic _proposal_.
What does this mean? It isn't merged until we made a final
discussion and decision about that? :/
I
On Friday, 18 January 2013 at 13:13:03 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-18 14:07, Namespace wrote:
Despite the danger that this annoy you probably:
What about pull 1019
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1019)? I'm
still
quite new with Git so I do not know exactly what 1
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 09:29:07 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Friday, 18 January 2013 at 13:13:03 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-01-18 14:07, Namespace wrote:
Despite the danger that this annoy you probably:
What about pull 1019
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1019
Does anyone else think, that merging this pull:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1428
would be better then waiting for pull 1019?
Pull 1428 is ready to merge and use.
If someday pull 1019 is ready, it can replace pull 1428.
Fact is, that this problem has caused big issues
Despite the danger that this annoy you probably:
What about pull 1019
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1019)? I'm
still quite new with Git so I do not know exactly what 1 Fail, 9
Pending means (and why it stands there so long) and how current
the merge determination
On 2013-01-18 14:07, Namespace wrote:
Despite the danger that this annoy you probably:
What about pull 1019
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1019)? I'm still
quite new with Git so I do not know exactly what 1 Fail, 9 Pending
means (and why it stands there so long)
It means
On Friday, 18 January 2013 at 13:13:03 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-18 14:07, Namespace wrote:
Despite the danger that this annoy you probably:
What about pull 1019
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1019)? I'm
still
quite new with Git so I do not know exactly what 1
Ok, thanks.
But nobody can tell me when and if the pull is merged, right?
I think many users here would be pleased if someone could say
something to this pull.
On Friday, 18 January 2013 at 18:35:47 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Ok, thanks.
But nobody can tell me when and if the pull is merged, right?
I think many users here would be pleased if someone could say
something to this pull.
Not sure what you mean?
Nobody will tell you when your pull fails the
Not sure what you mean?
Nobody will tell you when your pull fails the unittests.
When your pull actually gets merged for real into the head,
you aren't notified either (sadly), but the puller usually
leaves a merged comment, and you get *that* notification.
It isn't my pull but I want to
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Friday, 18 January 2013 at 18:35:47 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Ok, thanks.
But nobody can tell me when and if the pull is merged, right?
I think many users here would be pleased if someone could say something to
this pull.
Not sure what you
16 matches
Mail list logo
