Ok, finally understood.
I was trying to declare hof like this: void f2( pure int
function() param ) , similar to the way I declare usual pure
functions. Looks like it is syntax error and only void f2( int
function() pure param ) is allowed. That led me to false
conclusion, that such
mist:
Are there any reasons for this inconsistency?
I don't know. Maybe it's just a parser bug. There are some of those in Bugzilla.
If you don't like it, then I suggest you to add it to D Bugzilla.
Bye,
bearophile
Actually, looks like you have done it already 2 years ago :)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4505
Hello!
I have been asked few question recently from a Haskell programmer
about D2 and, after experimenting a bit, have found that I really
can't provide a good answe myself, as I am not getting a design
limititations (if any).
Here is the snippet, it is pretty self-descriptive:
Le 23/02/2012 21:00, mist a écrit :
Hello!
I have been asked few question recently from a Haskell programmer about
D2 and, after experimenting a bit, have found that I really can't
provide a good answe myself, as I am not getting a design limititations
(if any).
Here is the snippet, it is
But is there any way to actually say D compiler that I want this
function to accept only pure delegates?
On Thursday, February 23, 2012 21:17:46 mist wrote:
But is there any way to actually say D compiler that I want this
function to accept only pure delegates?
Mark the delegate type that it accepts as pure.
- Jonathan M Davis
