On 10/01/2014 10:00 PM, thedeemon wrote:
> Here's another benchmark:
> D AAs vs. Vibe.d's open addressing hashes vs. Robin Hood hashing:
> http://www.infognition.com/blog/2014/on_robin_hood_hashing.html
What a coincidence. :) Your blog article was written just two weeks ago.
Ali
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 21:40:01 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Are you motivated enough to compare D's associative arrays with
those results? :)
Here's another benchmark:
D AAs vs. Vibe.d's open addressing hashes vs. Robin Hood hashing:
http://www.infognition.com/blog/2014/on_robin_hood_h
Ali Çehreli:
Never mind then.
Well, now the D code is present, so why don't you benchmark it
(but I don't know how much correct it is)? :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On 10/01/2014 03:32 PM, bearophile wrote:
> Ali Çehreli:
>
>> Found on Reddit:
>
> Where's the Reddit thread?
There was just a single comment on it so I didn't think it was important:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2hzur4/benchmarking_hash_table_implementations_in/
> D associati
Ali Çehreli:
Found on Reddit:
Where's the Reddit thread?
Are you motivated enough to compare D's associative arrays with
those results? :)
D associative arrays are often even slower than CPython ones, so
I don't expect D to shine in this comparison.
This is a D port of the Java code, b
Oh wit! It is a read-only benchmark.
Am Wed, 01 Oct 2014 14:40:01 -0700
schrieb Ali Çehreli :
> Found on Reddit:
>
>
> http://lonewolfer.wordpress.com/2014/03/13/benchmarking-hash-table-implementations-in-different-languages/
>
> Are you motivated enough to compare D's associative arrays with those
> results? :)
>
> Ali
The qu
