On Wednesday, 31 May 2023 at 09:14:49 UTC, Dom DiSc wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 May 2023 at 03:29:33 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have to admit that I don’t really understand immutable. I
have an idea that it could mean that an object has an address
in ROM, so its value will never change. Maybe const
On Wednesday, 31 May 2023 at 03:29:33 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have to admit that I don’t really understand immutable. I
have an idea that it could mean that an object has an address
in ROM, so its value will never change. Maybe const doesn’t
give you such a strong guarantee, disallows ‘you’
On Wednesday, 31 May 2023 at 03:23:01 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 May 2023 at 04:15:22 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 5/29/23 19:57, Cecil Ward wrote:
> I wish to have one routine
> that can be called with either immutable or (possibly)
mutable argument
> values.
'const' should take
On Tuesday, 30 May 2023 at 04:15:22 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 5/29/23 19:57, Cecil Ward wrote:
> I wish to have one routine
> that can be called with either immutable or (possibly)
mutable argument
> values.
'const' should take both immutable and mutable. Can you show
your case with a short
On 5/29/23 10:57 PM, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have often come into difficulties where I wish to have one routine
that can be called with either immutable or (possibly) mutable argument
values. The argument(s) in question are in, readonly, passed by value or
passed by const reference. Anyway, no one
On 5/29/23 19:57, Cecil Ward wrote:
> I wish to have one routine
> that can be called with either immutable or (possibly) mutable argument
> values.
'const' should take both immutable and mutable. Can you show your case
with a short example?
> Could I make the one routine into a template?
On Tuesday, 30 May 2023 at 02:57:52 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have often come into difficulties where I wish to have one
routine that can be called with either immutable or (possibly)
mutable argument values. The argument(s) in question are in,
readonly, passed by value or passed by const
