On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 04:32:28 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> The simplest way I found is:
> TickDuration.from!"hnsecs"(duration.total!"hnsecs")
>
> Is there a simpler way?
There's now a pull request which adds opCast to Duration which casts to
TickDuration: https://github.com/D-Programmin
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 15:45:27 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 06:27:44 +0300, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Personally, I'd just Duration far those and not TickDuration. Duration
> > is just
> > as precise (if not more precise) than TickDuration as long as the system
>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 06:27:44 +0300, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Personally, I'd just Duration far those and not TickDuration. Duration
is just
as precise (if not more precise) than TickDuration as long as the system
ticks
aren't less than 1 hnsec apart. TickDuration is useful in that it gives
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 05:13:02 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 05:01:31 +0300, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > What are you doing that you want to create a TickDuration from a
> > Duration?
>
> On the one side, I have a module for running scheduled events. Event
> timing
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 05:01:31 +0300, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
What are you doing that you want to create a TickDuration from a
Duration?
On the one side, I have a module for running scheduled events. Event
timing is specified using a TickDuration, indicating the time interval
after which
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 04:32:28 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> The simplest way I found is:
> TickDuration.from!"hnsecs"(duration.total!"hnsecs")
>
> Is there a simpler way?
I don't believe so. A TickDuration can be cast (or use std.conv.to) to convert
to a Duration, but there is no cast in
