On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 21:49, Juanjo Alvarez <
juan...@thatwebmailofgoogleproperty.com> wrote:
> >> Curiously if you create holder like this, it will give an
> >> arrayoutofbound error at runtime, I don't know if that is a bug:
>
I think I got this one too. IIRC, it's a bug in the holder["test"]
Thanks for the suggestions. I'm still hankering after an elegant
solution to the receive rather than try to patch it up after the event.
The best I can come up with is pretty ugly (odd) at the front but looks
better at the back-end. Maybe someone can refine it a bit.
struct RATE{};
struct SRC_1{
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:00:48 +0200, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> On 27.09.2010 20:46, Juanjo Alvarez wrote:
>> I'm new to the language so I don't know if this is horribly wrong on
>> some levels, but it works:
>>
>> -
>>
>> import std.variant;
>> import std.stdio;
>>
>> cl
On 27.09.2010 20:46, Juanjo Alvarez wrote:
> I'm new to the language so I don't know if this is horribly wrong on some
> levels, but it works:
>
> -
>
> import std.variant;
> import std.stdio;
>
> class C
> {
> bool test(int i, char c) { writeln("Hello from test1
I'm new to the language so I don't know if this is horribly wrong on some
levels, but it works:
-
import std.variant;
import std.stdio;
class C
{
bool test(int i, char c) { writeln("Hello from test1"); return true; }
void test2(string v) { writeln("Hello from
On 27.09.2010 15:36, Bob Cowdery wrote:
> Thanks. Do you know if the signature is a mandatory part. If I left the
> signature out would it then only work with a delegate with no
> parameters? If so I think I'm in the same state as my delegates will not
> all have the same signature.
>
Yep, the s
Thanks. Do you know if the signature is a mandatory part. If I left the
signature out would it then only work with a delegate with no
parameters? If so I think I'm in the same state as my delegates will not
all have the same signature.
Bob
On 27/09/2010 14:21, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> On 27.09.201
On 27.09.2010 15:07, Bob Cowdery wrote:
>
> Failing that I think a dispatcher structure using an associative array
> would be my next choice. However I'm getting stuck on how to define and
> use an array which maps a string key to a delegate. Can someone help me
> out there please. I will then eff
