On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 18:49:25 UTC, Bishop120 wrote:
I figured this would be a simple parallel foreach function with
an iota range of sizeX and just making int X declared inside
the function so that I didnt have to worry about shared
variable but I cant get around the alive++ reductio
On 24.11.2015 19:49, Bishop120 wrote:
I figured this would be a simple parallel foreach function with an iota
range of sizeX and just making int X declared inside the function so
that I didnt have to worry about shared variable but I cant get around
the alive++ reduction and I dont understand eno
