On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 20:22:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 12:57:04 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 10:15:00 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
It can't work, because main could be stored in a pre-built
object or
static library that's passed to DMD.
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 12:57:04 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 10:15:00 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
It can't work, because main could be stored in a pre-built
object or
static library that's passed to DMD.
Hmm I really should consider making a DIP for a deferred
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 10:15:00 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
It can't work, because main could be stored in a pre-built
object or
static library that's passed to DMD.
Hmm I really should consider making a DIP for a deferred CTFE
block. Could really come in handy for a situation like this.
On 3/16/14, Sergei Nosov wrote:
> Thx! That's better, but I think -main switch could be made to
> work like 'add or replace main by stub' instead of just 'add'. I
> don't think it'll hurt anybody, what do you think?
It can't work, because main could be stored in a pre-built object or
static libra
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 08:22:04 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 07:59:33 UTC, Sergei Nosov wrote:
Hi!
Suppose I have a small .d script that has a main. Is there any
simple way to just run the unit tests without running main at
all?
Here's the first thing that came to
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 07:59:33 UTC, Sergei Nosov wrote:
Hi!
Suppose I have a small .d script that has a main. Is there any
simple way to just run the unit tests without running main at
all?
Here's the first thing that came to mind:
If you never want to both unit tests and regular main:
