On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Arild Boes wrote:
> Actually the f-call syntactic sugar seems like a good way to keep core
> classes of any library very lean and mean, whilst maintaining the ability to
> expand the module without re-compiling the original library! (just import
> this guy, and th
Jarrett Billingsley skrev:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Arild Boes wrote:
Take a look at the 'this' of D2, it allows to create wrapper structs, so
you can just add methods to the built-in arrays.
Bye,
bearophile
Please elaborate on this. How does one do that?
With the new, delicious "
Jarrett Billingsley:
> Though actually I'm not sure why bearophile suggested this,
The original poster seems to want to add some methods to a standard array. With
this you can give another module something that acts like an array that also
has such methods, or replaces them. With the old way you
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Arild Boes wrote:
>> Take a look at the 'this' of D2, it allows to create wrapper structs, so
>> you can just add methods to the built-in arrays.
>>
>> Bye,
>> bearophile
>
> Please elaborate on this. How does one do that?
With the new, delicious "alias this."
bearophile skrev:
Andrew Spott:
yes, however there are going to be a few new classes that will be implemented
in this (dot products, cross products, etc)
You mean a few new methods.
Take a look at the 'this' of D2, it allows to create wrapper structs, so you
can just add methods to the buil
Andrew Spott:
> yes, however there are going to be a few new classes that will be implemented
> in this (dot products, cross products, etc)
You mean a few new methods.
Take a look at the 'this' of D2, it allows to create wrapper structs, so you
can just add methods to the built-in arrays.
Bye,
yes, however there are going to be a few new classes that will be implemented
in this (dot products, cross products, etc)
Thanks for the help.
-Andrew
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:33:29 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
> wrote:
>
> > e.g., the following code does almost
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:33:29 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
e.g., the following code does almost the same thing you are doing without
requiring a new class:
correction, the code does *exactly* the same thing you are doing.
-Steve
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:01:28 -0400, Andrew Spott
wrote:
So, the attached is supposed to be a class that creates a vector of any
type (I would like it to only take numerical values (int, float, real,
double, etc), however, I am ok with it taking others (not that I see why
someone would us
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:01:28 +0400, Andrew Spott wrote:
So, the attached is supposed to be a class that creates a vector of any
type (I would like it to only take numerical values (int, float, real,
double, etc), however, I am ok with it taking others (not that I see why
someone would use
10 matches
Mail list logo
